Skip to content

· Private foundation

Keiser Lala P Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$67kArts & Culture$32kYouth Development$32kHealth$32kHuman Services$28kEducation$21k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,989
Median grant
3
States reached
$678k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,483
CHARLOTTE COUNTY ART GUILD$4,483
FLORIDA SHERIFFS YOUTH RANCHES$4,483
DEFIANCE COLLEGE$2,989
GENACROSS LUTHERAN SERVICES FDN$2,989
SHRINERS HOSPITALS CHILDREN TRUST$2,989
GALLIA COUNTY CHILDRENS HOME$2,989
NEW LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,989
HOLZER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,494
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY: $3k → 18%LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY: $3k → 18%LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$212k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue -3%
  • CC
    CHARLOTTE COUNTY ART GUILD INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue -13%
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $32k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    2/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    HOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $31,774 · OtherHOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHGALLIA COUNTY CHILDRENS HOME: $21,182 · OtherGALLIA COUNTY CHILDRENS HOMENEW LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $21,182 · OtherNEW LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCHGENACROSS LUTHERAN SERVICES FDN: $14,033 · OtherGENACROSS LUTHERAN SERVICES FDNSHRINERS HOSPITALS CHILDREN TRUST: $5,749 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS CHILDREN TRUSTHOLZER MEDICAL CENTER: $4,854 · OtherFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $31,774 · Youth DevelopmentFlorida Sheriffs…CHARLOTTE COUNTY ART GUILD INC: $31,774 · Arts & CultureCHARLOTTE COUNTY…DEFIANCE COLLEGE: $21,304 · EducationDEFIANCE CO…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,433 · HealthSHRINERS HO…HOLZER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,737 · HealthHOLZER HOSP…LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC: $7,149 · Human Services
    Other$98,774Youth Development$31,774Arts & Culture$31,774Education$21,304Health$21,170Human Services$7,149

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $31,774 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE COUNTY ART GUILD INC: $31,774 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetDEFIANCE COLLEGE: $21,304 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,433 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC: $7,149 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLZER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,737 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
    • Who funds CHARLOTTE COUNTY ART GUILD INC ↗
    • Who funds DEFIANCE COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds HOLZER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Keiser Lala P Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keiser Lala P Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Keiser Lala P Ta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph