Skip to content
Kansas Parents as Teachers Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kansas Parents as Teachers Association

Supporting early childhood education programs in kansas with a parent education component.

$261k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.1MCommunity Improvement$118kCivil Rights$117kHuman Services$109kHealth$41kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $228,762, the rows itemized in this filing. The $261,174 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,412 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $199k
$11,798
Median grant
1
States reached
$342k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSE HILL PARENTS AS TEACHERS$46,827
PAOLA PAT CONSORTIUM$22,032
TOPEKA USD 501$19,023
DERBY USD 260$16,571
HARVEY COUNTY PAT$14,026
USD 308 HUTCHINSON$13,506
LAWRENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$12,049
USD 232 OF JOHNSON COUNTY$11,798
BELOIT PAT CONSORTIUM$11,287
ROCK CREEK USD 323$10,613
LEARNING COOPERATIVE OF$10,575
KEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERS$10,329
WINFIELD USD 465$8,397
GARDNER-EDGERTON SCHOOL$8,121
SOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATION$7,256
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLUE VALLEY: $13k → 5%PAOLA PAT CONSORTIUM: $46k → 7%ROCK CREEK USD 323: $11k → 7%ROSE HILL PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $67k → 8%KEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $57k → 8%HARVEY COUNTY PAT: $31k → 9%SHAWNEE MISSION USD 512: $20k → 11%BELOIT PAT CONSORTIUM: $15k → 12%USD 349 STRAFFORD: $25k → 13%LEARNING COOPERATIVE OF: $17k → 13%TOPEKA USD 501: $38k → 14%LAWRENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $12k → 15%USD 308 HUTCHINSON: $43k → 15%DERBY USD 260: $17k → 16%WINFIELD USD 465: $22k → 16%SOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATION: $59k → 18%PAOLA PAT CONSORTIUM: $33k → 7%ROSE HILL PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $66k → 8%KEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $29k → 8%HARVEY COUNTY PAT: $30k → 9%SHAWNEE MISSION USD 512: $17k → 11%BELOIT PAT CONSORTIUM: $11k → 12%USD 349 STRAFFORD: $20k → 13%LEARNING COOPERATIVE OF: $11k → 13%TOPEKA USD 501: $25k → 14%USD 308 HUTCHINSON: $29k → 15%DERBY USD 260: $17k → 16%WINFIELD USD 465: $18k → 16%SOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATION: $56k → 18%USD 232 OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $12k → 5%PAOLA PAT CONSORTIUM: $22k → 7%ROSE HILL PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $53k → 8%KEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $28k → 8%HARVEY COUNTY PAT: $14k → 9%SHAWNEE MISSION USD 512: $17k → 11%LEARNING COOPERATIVE OF: $11k → 13%TOPEKA USD 501: $19k → 14%USD 308 HUTCHINSON: $18k → 15%DERBY USD 260: $17k → 16%WINFIELD USD 465: $16k → 16%SOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATION: $33k → 18%PAOLA PAT CONSORTIUM: $16k → 7%ROSE HILL PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $47k → 8%HARVEY COUNTY PAT: $12k → 9%USD 308 HUTCHINSON: $14k → 15%KANSAS CITY AREA CONSORTIUM: $57k → 5%KANSAS CITY AREA CONSORTIUM: $25k → 5%KANSAS CITY AREA CONSORTIUM: $23k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +327% since the first grant, against -55% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+327%
-55%

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U3
    USD 394-ROSE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $233k
  • SK
    SOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $155k
  • KP
    KEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $124k

Funded once

  • U3
    USD 363 HOLCOMB
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • CH
    CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSN
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USD 394-ROSE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $232,760 · OtherUSD 394-ROSE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLSSOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATION: $154,686 · OtherSOUTHEAST KANSAS EDUCATIONKEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERS: $124,363 · OtherKEYSTONE PARENTS AS TEACHERSPAOLA PAT CONSORTIUM: $117,263 · OtherPAOLA PAT CONSORTIUMUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 233: $105,625 · OtherUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 233HUTCHINSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $103,096 · OtherHUTCHINSON PUBLIC SCHOOLSTopeka Public Schools USD 501: $91,490 · OtherTopeka Public Schools USD 501USD 373 Newton: $86,590 · OtherUSD 373 NewtonWINFIELD USD 465: $64,701 · OtherUSD 260-DERBY: $57,115 · OtherShawnee Mission School District USD 512: $53,357 · Other+12 more: $220,712 · Other+12 moreSTAFFORD COMMUNITY USD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $51,139 · EducationLYONS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 405 EDUCATION ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION: $5,802 · Philanthropy
Other$1,411,758Education$51,139Philanthropy$5,802

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAFFORD COMMUNITY USD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $51,139 over 3y, 42% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAFFORD COMMUNITY USD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LYONS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 405 EDUCATION ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kansas Association of…For Inspiration and R…Giving the Basics Inc
Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral AgenciesKS21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Giving the Basics Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kansas Parents as Teachers Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kansas Parents as Teachers Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kansas Parents as Teachers Association?

    Find your warmest path to Kansas Parents as Teachers Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kansas Parents as Teachers Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home