· Public charity
Kamenitzer Yeshiva of Jerusalem
Organization has made grants to a religious school in Jerusalem known as Kamenitzer Yeshiva that helps underprivileged children.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
- $250k+1 grant · $252k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cong Beis Sholom | $251,700 |
| Iyun Haparsha1 | $60,000 |
| Cong Kneses Simcha | $28,000 |
| Torah Relief Society Inc | $20,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Grants abroad, by region: $2.5M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $2.1M to organizations and $489k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
How this is measured
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 4 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Play a game based on Kamenitzer Yeshiva of Jerusalem’s filings →