Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kalhan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$960
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Kalhan Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Kalhan Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $2k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’20
5
’21
4
’22
3
’23
4
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$200kEducation$41kInternational$7kReligion$3kFood & Nutrition$2kCivil Rights$1kArts & Culture$505Public Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Save the Children$960
Greater Cleveland Food Bank$500
Dining for Women$240
Human Service Trust Zambia$200
Southern Poverty Law center$100
Cleveland Museum of Art$90
National Park Cons Association$65
WCPN$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Drexel University Law school: $1k → 22%Doctors without Borders: $1k → 17%World central Kitchen: $500 → 14%Southern Poverty Law Center: $100 → 18%Save the Children: $1k → 9%Ideas stream Cleveland: $100 → 17%Refugee One: $3k → 14%Fidelity Charitable: $103k → 11%Doctors without Borders: $500 → 17%National Park Cons Association: $100 → 14%Southern Poverty Law center: $100 → 18%Save the Children: $1k → 9%Ideas stream Cleveland: $80 → 17%North Park Elementary School: $25k → 14%Fidelity Charitable: $96k → 11%National Park Cons Association: $100 → 14%Save the Children: $960 → 9%WCPN: $70 → 17%North Park Elementary School: $15k → 14%National Park Cons Association: $100 → 14%Save the Children: $960 → 9%WCPN: $60 → 17%North Park Elementary School: $1k → 14%National Park Cons Association: $65 → 14%Save the Children: $870 → 9%WCPN: $60 → 17%National Park Cons Association: $65 → 14%Save the Children: $270 → 9%WCPN: $50 → 17%National Parks Conservation Associa: $65 → 14%Helping hands FICA: $50 → 17%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $500 → 17%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $500 → 17%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $500 → 17%Pepper Pike Civic league: $20 → 17%Pepper Pike Civic league: $20 → 17%Cleveland Museum of Art: $175 → 17%Cleveland Museum of Art: $90 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
CT
KY
SC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 11 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$52k
$115

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+29%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +13%
  • TW
    TOGETHER WOMEN RISE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $65 · revenue +29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
2
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
8
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
12
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cleveland Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $198,523 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDNORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $41,000 · EducationNORTH PARK ELEMENT…Save The Children Federation Inc: $5,190 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 · InternationalREFUGEEONE: $2,500 · ReligionDrexel University Law school: $1,000 · OtherNational Park Cons Association: $430 · OtherWCPN: $240 · OtherHuman Service Trust Zambia: $200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $180 · OtherCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $265 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 · Other+3 more: $155 · OtherGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionTOGETHER WOMEN RISE: $1,440 · Philanthropy
Community Improvement$198,523Education$41,000International$7,190Religion$2,500Other$2,670Food & Nutrition$1,500Philanthropy$1,440

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $198,523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $41,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,190 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WOMEN RISE: $1,440 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $265 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kalhan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kalhan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kalhan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kalhan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kalhan’s filings →

More from the funding graph