Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kachel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$274k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MReligion$113kFood & Nutrition$40kCommunity Improvement$20kRecreation & Sports$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kPhilanthropy$12kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $217k
$15,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION$117,435
IRVIN L YOUNG MEMORIAL LIBRARY$100,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION$15,250
CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY$7,250
WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY$5,000
WHITEWATER MIDDLE SCHOOL$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS FOOTBALL FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%AFFORDABLE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $5k → 10%CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $7k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $189k → 10%CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $188k → 10%CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $160k → 10%CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $151k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $144k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $142k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $134k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $117k → 10%IRVIN L YOUNG MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $100k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER: $27k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER: $25k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER: $25k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%WHITEWATER FEDERATION OF WOMENS CLUBS ENDOWMENT FUND: $10k → 10%WHITEWATER AQUATIC CENTER INC: $10k → 10%CITY OF WHITEWATER: $5k → 10%CITY OF WHITEWATER: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER 4TH OF JULY CORPORATION: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER 4TH OF JULY CORPORATION: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER 4TH OF JULY CORPORATION: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER 4TH OF JULY CORPORATION: $5k → 10%WHITEWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 10%WHITEWATER MIDDLE SCHOOL: $3k → 10%WHITEWATER LEADS INC: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WHITEWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WHITEWATER HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 6 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$1.4M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+67%

Still filing today

33%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +3%
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $103k
  • WF
    WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k

Funded once

  • WA
    WHITEWATER AQUATIC CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • WF
    WHITEWATER FEDERATION OF WOMENS CLUBS ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
White County Medical Foundation

Unity health - foundation was established to support the activities of white county medical center, inc. including sponsorship and assistance to improve medical and patient care at the within the unity health system.

Philanthropy
2
The Westminster Foundation Inc

To assist in the continuance of providing quality healthcare at westminster villiage north to its residents.

—
3
Whitefish Community Foundation Inc

The whitefish community foundation is dedicated to fostering philanthropy, building endowments, and helping donors and nonprofits benefit our community.

Philanthropy
4
The Wha Foundation Inc

The wha foundation, inc. was formed to carry on educational, literacy, research, and charitable program related to the field of health, including but not limited to hospital care and administration, with the following specific objects: to…

—
5
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
6
Wilderness Health Care Foundation Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to provide funds to or for the benefit of clifton-fine hospital.

—
7
White River Health System Foundation Inc

White river health system foundation, inc. was established to support the activities of wrhs, including sponsorship and assistance to improve medical and patient care at the system.

—
8
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
9
Washburn University Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the university and communities that have touched the lives of wu alumni and friends, the mission of the washburn university charitable gift fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable…

Education
10
Uwm At Waukesha Foundation Inc

To raise scholarship money for students and raise the awareness of the campus and all of the activities on campus

—
11
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
12
Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uw-Whitewater Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Circus World Museum Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $1,242,465 · EducationUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INCFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - WHITEWATER: $103,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST C…IRVIN L YOUNG MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $100,000 · OtherIRVIN L YOUNG MEMORIAL L…WHITEWATER FOOD PANTRY: $40,000 · OtherWHITEWATER FOOD PANTRYWHITEWATER 4TH OF JULY CORPORATION: $20,000 · OtherWHITEWATER 4TH OF JULY C…CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $16,950 · Other+17 more: $64,350 · Other+17 moreWHITEWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyFORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Health
Education$1,242,465Other$344,300Philanthropy$12,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $1,242,465 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetCUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $16,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZOR SHRINERS: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCUS WORLD MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRHAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WHITEWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AFFORDABLE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOR SHRINERS ↗
  • Who funds CIRCUS WORLD MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRHAVEN FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kachel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kachel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kachel Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kachel Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kachel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph