Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

K2M Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$25kHuman Services$500Education$307Health$104
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,146
Median grant
4
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
One Soma Global$1,200
Creative Lab Collective$1,146
Mission Kindgom Ministries$570
Movember Foundation$104
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 63% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%A Transforming Word Ministries: $2k → 13%Calyx Institute: $307 → 20%European Initiative: $750 → 11%Commission Ministers: $500 → 13%One Soma Global: $1k → 16%Mission Kindgom Ministries: $570 → 6%Project AP New Horizons: $100 → 9%FoundNations: $200 → 17%A Transforming Word Ministries: $1k → 13%One Soma Global: $1k → 16%Mission Kindgom Ministries: $570 → 6%Project AP: $100 → 9%A Transforming Word Ministries: $1k → 13%One Soma Global: $1k → 16%Mission Kindgom Ministries: $518 → 6%Foundnations: $1k → 9%A Transforming Word Ministries: $1k → 13%One Soma Global: $1k → 16%Foundnations: $500 → 9%One Soma Global: $1k → 16%Creative Lab Collective: $1k → 9%Creative Lab Collective: $1k → 9%Creative Lab Collective: $833 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
WY
CA
CO
NE
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24k · 7 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$24k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+33%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’25
ReligionEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    A Transforming Word Ministries
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k
  • OS
    One Soma Global Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k
  • CM
    Crossroads Ministry
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k

Funded once

  • EI
    EUROPEAN INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $750 · revenue +33%
  • CM
    Commission Ministers
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • CI
    CALYX INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $307 · revenue +113%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disciple Maker Ministries

Disciple Maker Ministries is devoted to fulfilling the Great Commission through evangelism and reproducing discipleship.

Religion
2
Verticle Living Ministries

To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by

Religion
3
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
4
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
5
Transform Ministries
6
Gospel Joy International

Gospel Joy's Mission is to passionately proclaim the cross-centered, Christ-treasuring Gospel and to make disciples who live for the glory of God by striving to maximize their joy and the joy of others in Him. Its vision is to contribute…

International
7
African Ministries International

Spread the gospel of Jesus Christ the Word of God as contained in the Bible

Food & Nutrition
8
Euromedia Missions
9
Teaching Missions International Inc

Provide theological education in mostly developing nations, for those pastors, church planters and other church leaders who do not have access to theological education, whether for lack of time or money. The curriculum is typically what…

Religion
10
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

11
Emanual Ministries International
Religion
12
Exciting Word Ministries

Evangelism and Church Establishment in Northern India

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ekko Worship Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Movember Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

A Transforming Word Ministries — $5,879 · ReligionA Transforming Word MinistriesOne Soma Global Inc — $5,800 · ReligionOne Soma Global IncMISSION KINGDOM MINISTRIES INC — $1,658 · ReligionMISSION KINGDOM MINISTRIES INCEUROPEAN INITIATIVE — $750 · ReligionCrossroads Ministry — $3,900 · OtherCrossroads MinistryFoundnations — $1,800 · OtherFoundnationsIndividual grant recipient — $1,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCommission Ministers — $500 · OtherCommission Ministers+3 more — $400 · OtherEKKO WORSHIP ALLIANCE — $3,229 · EducationEKKO WORSHIP AL…CALYX INSTITUTE — $307 · EducationCALYX INSTITUTEMOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $104 · Health
Religion$14,087Other$8,308Education$3,536Health$104

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetA Transforming Word Ministries — $5,879 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetOne Soma Global Inc — $5,800 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetEKKO WORSHIP ALLIANCE — $3,229 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMISSION KINGDOM MINISTRIES INC — $1,658 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEUROPEAN INITIATIVE — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALYX INSTITUTE — $307 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTerradez Ministries — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A Transforming Word Ministries
  • Who funds One Soma Global Inc
  • Who funds EKKO WORSHIP ALLIANCE
  • Who funds MISSION KINGDOM MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds EUROPEAN INITIATIVE
  • Who funds CALYX INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Terradez Ministries
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization K2M Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph