Skip to content
Jvs Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jvs Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$288kReligion$198kEducation$26kHealth$5kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$1,001
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES$31,040
SHAARE ZION CONGREGATION$2,600
YEKERAI YERUSHALAYIM INC$2,600
GEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI YITZCHOK$2,002
KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST$1,800
NEW YORK CENTER INC$1,250
MAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL$1,002
YESHIVA MIKDASH MELECH$1,001
UCEF FUND INC$1,001
AMER FRIENDS OF RAMOT TORAH SCHOOLS$1,001
ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP$1,001
CONGREGATION SHAARE RAHAMIM INC$1,001
AMER FR OF YESHIVAT BET EL HADAYA$1,001
Individual grant recipient$1,001
DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1k → 17%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1k → 17%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1k → 11%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1k → 17%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$562k · 25 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$562k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+62%

Still filing today

36%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +43%
  • BY
    BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +49%
  • KH
    KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST
    7× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • TM
    TORAT MOSHE VOHEL YOSEF
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • YK
    YESHIVA KOL YAAKOV
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • AV
    AHABA VE AHVA OF OCEAN PARKWAY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
3
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
4
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
5
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
10
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
11
Yeshivat Mekor Chaim Inc

High school, offering academic classes in english, history, math, and science, as well as a full array of courses in judaic studies and co-curricular activities such as physical education and classes in the arts.

Education
12
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Darche Eres Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $287,524 · OtherMISC ORGANIZED CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SHAARE RAHAMIM INC: $32,069 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE RAHAMIM INCSHAARE ZION CONGREGATION: $20,800 · Other+23 more: $109,871 · Other+23 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $23,400 · EducationAMERICAN …BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $22,503 · EducationBET YAAKO…YESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $2,002 · Education+3 more: $3,005 · Education+3 moreKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $16,754 · PhilanthropyYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $6,006 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $2,800 · ReligionISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $5,004 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,452 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,775 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $1,002 · Food & Nutrition
Other$500,264Education$50,910Philanthropy$16,754Religion$8,806Human Services$6,456Youth Development$2,775Food & Nutrition$1,002

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $23,400 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $22,503 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $16,754 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $9,110 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $6,006 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $5,004 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $2,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,452 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $1,002 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,002 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP ↗
  • Who funds TIFERET MORDECAI INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UCEF FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Jewish Communal FundThe Amin and Lillian …The Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…Ic Hessed FoundationThe Jimmy and Berta K…E R G FoundationIsaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY44.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Ic Hessed Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · E R G Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jvs Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jvs Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jvs’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home