Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julymar Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$420k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$5.6MReligion$2.4MHuman Services$1.5MHealth$1.4MYouth Development$1.2MEducation$801kPhilanthropy$688kCrime & Legal$259kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $264k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $961k
  • $250k+2 grants · $779k
$31,685
Median grant
—
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUNDACION BERTA MARTINEZ$420,000
CARMELITAS DE SAN JOSE$359,292
FUNDACION SMURFIT KAPPA COLOMBIA$232,715
FUNDACION CARDIO INFANTIL$200,640
FUNDACION ALBEIRO VARGAS Y ANGELES CUSTODIOS$132,550
FUNDACION ORGANIZACION VID$129,880
FUNDACION HOGAR SAN VINCENT DE PAUL DE POPAYAN$97,065
FUNDACION AMIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYOR$96,750
HOGAR SAN JOSE DE PUENTE NACIONAL$70,945
CENTRO GERONTOLOGICO Y VIDA LUISA MARCELINA$46,250
CENTRO DE BIENESTAR DEL ANCIANO SAN GIL$40,807
FUNDACION GRATITUD$31,685
CENTRO DE BEINESTAR DEL ANCIANO SANTA ANA$25,062
CENTRO DE BIENESTAR DEL ANCIANO DE BUCARAMANGA$19,700
MUSEO DE ARTE MODERNO DE BOGOTA$19,165
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 4% of grant dollars ($643k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 96% that went abroad ($14M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 25% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOGAR SAN ANTONIO: $115k → 9%HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO SAN IGNACIO: $493k → 6%FUNDACION CARVAJAL: $47k → 11%THE MIAMI FOUNDATION: $643k → 15%CORPORACION SUPERARSE: $12k → 9%HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO SAN IGNACIO: $220k → 6%PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $220k → 6%PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $200k → 6%HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO SAN IGNACIO: $200k → 6%PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $180k → 6%PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $95k → 6%HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO SAN IGNACIO: $70k → 6%UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLE: $61k → 6%UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLE: $13k → 6%PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $12k → 6%PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $12k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 96% of all-years giving ($14M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Colombia$14M · 117 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 33 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
12

Total granted

$12M
$1.5M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $278k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FUNDACION AMIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYOR
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M
  • FS
    FUNDACION SMURFIT KAPPA COLOMBIA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M
  • FB
    FUNDACION BERTA MARTINEZ
    4× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M

Funded once

  • FM
    FUJNDACIONA MAIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYOR
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • FA
    FUJNDACION AMIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYOR
    one grant, 2018 · $370k
  • FC
    FUNDACION CARULLA AEIOTU
    one grant, 2019 · $166k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUNDACION AMIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYOR: $1,219,744 · OtherFUNDACION AMIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYORFUNDACION SMURFIT KAPPA COLOMBIA: $1,180,066 · OtherFUNDACION SMURFIT KAPPA COLOMBIAFUNDACION BERTA MARTINEZ: $1,098,715 · OtherFUNDACION BERTA MARTINEZFUNDACION NELLY RAMIREZ MORENO: $1,070,000 · OtherFUNDACION NELLY RAMIREZ MORENOFUNDACION JOHN RAMIREZ MORENO: $1,040,000 · OtherFUNDACION JOHN RAMIREZ MORENOHOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO SAN IGNACIO: $983,770 · OtherHOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO SAN IGNACIOFUNDACION CARDIO INFANTIL: $845,824 · OtherFUNDACION CARDIO INFANTILPONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA: $718,048 · OtherFUJNDACIONA MAIGOS DEL TEATRO MAYOR: $500,000 · OtherCARMELITAS DE SAN JOSE: $473,052 · Other+39 more: $4,741,908 · Other+39 moreTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $643,000 · Philanthropy
Other$13,871,127Philanthropy$643,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $643,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julymar Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julymar Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julymar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph