Skip to content

· Private foundation

JSL Education Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$15kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$500International$500Health$500Civil Rights$500Youth Development$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Duke University$1,500
Texas A&M University Corpus Christi$1,500
Emily K Center$1,000
UH College of Business Foundation$500
Houston Nursing Education Foundation$500
Holocaust Museum Houston$500
Jewish Federation of Greater Houston$250
Sion James Foundation$250
Anti-Defamation League$250
St Rose of Lima Catholic School$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Jewish Family Service: $500 → 14%Jewish Family Service: $250 → 14%Convenant House Texas: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of JSL Education Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 79%.

JSL Education Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16k · 8 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$16k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+3%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +95%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $750 · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VC
    Victoria College
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k
  • HC
    Houston Community College
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k
  • TS
    Texas State Univ
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Jewish Security Initiative
Crime & Legal
2
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas

As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.

—
5
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
6
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
7
Jewish Life Foundation
—
8
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
11
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
12
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Houston; the most unlike its peers is Houston Nursing Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emily K Center: $4,000 · OtherEmily K CenterUniversity of Texas at Austin: $3,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas at AustinVictoria College: $1,500 · OtherVictoria CollegeTexas A&M University Corpus Christi: $1,500 · OtherTexas A&M University Corpus ChristiHouston Community College: $1,500 · OtherHouston Community CollegeTexas State Univ: $1,500 · OtherTexas State UnivSt Rose of Lima Catholic School: $1,000 · OtherSt Rose of Lima Catholic School+6 more: $2,250 · Other+6 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYHouston Nursing Education Foundation: $500 · EducationHouston Nursing Educat…HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $2,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $750 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $250 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $250 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250 · International
Other$16,250Education$5,000Arts & Culture$2,000Human Services$1,000Civil Rights$500International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Nursing Education Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Houston Nursing Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JSL Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JSL Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to JSL Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to JSL Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on JSL Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph