Skip to content
Journey for New Hope at a glance

· Public charity

Journey for New Hope

Christian medical mission and contribution to supported organization.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

International$136kHuman Services$71kReligion$64kEducation$44kArts & Culture$20k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $251,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $300,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $49,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AFRICA FUTURE FOUNDATION$88,000
FPCOC$35,000
WOMB HEART$21,000
BETHEL CLASSICAL ACADEMY$20,000
21TH CENTURY WORLD MISSION$13,000
GLOBAL DENTAL ALLIANCE$10,000
AFRICA FUTURE FOUNDATION$10,000
IRVINE ONNURI CHURCH$10,000
EVANGELIA UNIVERSITY$10,000
CHRIST GLOBAL NETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
LA CHAMBER CHOIR$10,000
YWAM SHIPS KONA$8,000
ALTOGATHER IN LOVE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALTOGATHER IN LOVE: $9k → 10%ALTOGATHER IN LOVE: $6k → 10%CHRIST GLOBAL NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 84% of Journey for New Hope’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 13%.

Journey for New Hopelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$247k · 5 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$247k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

80%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AFRICA FUTURE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $128k · revenue +19%
  • BC
    BETHEL CLASSICAL ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue +9%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES CHAMBER CHOIR INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • W
    WOMB
    one grant, 2025 · $21k · revenue 0%
  • 2C
    21 Century World Mission Centergraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $13k · revenue +60%
  • CG
    CHRISTIAN GLOBAL NETWORK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
2
Europe Campus Ministry

The Organization is formed for Christian evangelism and discipleship training as afundamentalist, evangelical, and non-denominational faith-based missionorganization. Its mission is to reach out to students with the whole of gospel ofJesus…

Religion
3
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
4
Grace for All Nations Ministries International

Grace For All Nations Ministries International exists

Religion
5
Christian Ministries International
—
6
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
7
Faith Speaks World Outreach

World outreach

Religion
8
Born Again Body Incdba Bueno Amigos

Missionary ministry to foreign countries

—
9
Ateiku Christian Ministry
Community Improvement
10
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
11
Back to Eden World Mission

Church

Religion
12
Overseas Christian Ministries Inc

To take the gospel of jesus christ to the unevangelized areas of the world. to provide socail services in areas of health, education and relief work among christians and others. to appeal for funds and to receive donations and gifts from…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywam Ships Orange County; the most unlike its peers is Womb. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFRICA FUTURE FOUNDATION: $128,000 · InternationalAFRICA FUTURE FOUNDATIONYWAM Ships Orange County: $8,000 · InternationalYWAM Ships Orange CountyFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ORANGE COUNTY: $50,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH …WOMB: $21,000 · OtherWOMBALTOGATHER IN LOVE: $6,000 · OtherALTOGATHER IN LOVEBETHEL CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $34,000 · EducationBETHEL CLASSIC…EVANGELIA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationEVANGELIA UNIV…21 Century World Mission Center: $13,000 · Religion21 Century …IRVINE ONNURI CHURCH: $10,000 · ReligionIRVINE ONNU…GLOBAL DENTAL ALLIANCE: $10,000 · ReligionGLOBAL DENT…ALTOGETHER IN LOVE: $14,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN GLOBAL NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES CHAMBER CHOIR INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
International$136,000Other$77,000Education$44,000Religion$33,000Human Services$24,500Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFRICA FUTURE FOUNDATION: $128,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetBETHEL CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $34,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWOMB: $21,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLOS ANGELES CHAMBER CHOIR INC: $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetALTOGETHER IN LOVE: $14,500 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetCHRISTIAN GLOBAL NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEVANGELIA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Journey for New Hope funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Journey for New Hope. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Journey for New Hope?

    Find your warmest path to Journey for New Hope through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Journey for New Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home