Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph J Jaroschak Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$847k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MReligion$875kHealth$140kCrime & Legal$98kHuman Services$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $359k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $414k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER'S UNIVERSITY$200,000
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - MADELINE ROGALA$103,475
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - FOR JAMES MALLON$60,921
ST BARTHOLEMEW CHURCH$50,000
KEISER UNIVERSITY - SIERRAH PAYNE$34,010
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE- LUC ACQUAVIVA$30,000
ARRHYTHMIC TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE- KIM KOGER$28,500
DREW UNIVERSITY - FOR HALEY MEIERHOFER$25,400
DIOCESE OF METUCHEN$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ST THOMAS CHURCH$25,000
MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY - FOR KAYLIE FENNER$24,320
UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD - CLAUDIA GABA$24,232
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE - NICK VALENTINO$24,000
MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY - SAMANTHA KAZMIEREK$21,777
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
DE
NM
TN
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Joseph J Jaroschak Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 65%.

Joseph J Jaroschak Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 34 repeat orgs$616k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
22

Total granted

$2.6M
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-3%

Still filing today

15%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $414k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthReligionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $88k · revenue +54%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +392%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • BU
    BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - MADELINE ROGA
    one grant, 2024 · $34k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE - NICK VALEN
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD - CLAUDIA GA
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
10
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
11
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
12
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology; the most unlike its peers is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $620,000 · OtherST PETER'S UNIVERSITYST BARTHOLEMEW CHURCH: $335,000 · OtherST BARTHOLEMEW CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST THOMAS CHURCH: $175,000 · OtherST THOMAS CHURCHDIOCESE OF METUCHEN: $175,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF METUCHENPALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPR - FOR AND: $110,389 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITY - FOR MORGAN: $106,980 · OtherBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - MADELINE ROGALA: $103,475 · Other+61 more: $1,115,110 · Other+61 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $87,784 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationFairleigh Dickinson University: $8,045 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthFIRST STEP FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY UNIONTOWN AREA CONFERENCE: $5,000 · Religion
Other$2,915,954Education$155,829Human Services$60,000Health$35,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $87,784 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARRHYTHMIA TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE INC: $28,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $8,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STEP FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY UNIONTOWN AREA CONFERENCE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ARRHYTHMIA TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph J Jaroschak Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph J Jaroschak Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph J Jaroschak’s filings →

More from the funding graph