Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph Francis Wallace Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$291k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$124k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.5MHealth$485kYouth Development$237kFood & Nutrition$132kEducation$108kHuman Services$60kMembership Benefit$56kEnvironment$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $174k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
McGehee Hospital Foundation$124,372
Boys Girls Club of Southeast AR$50,000
UAM Foundation$25,000
McGehee Food Pantry$20,000
McGehee Cemetery Assoc$20,000
First Baptist Church Memorial Kitch$15,000
City of McGehee OwlfestFlood Disast$12,911
Paws Claws$8,000
Foundation for Boys Girls Club of M$5,000
McGehee Men's Club$5,000
First Presbyterian Church$2,500
Desha County Library$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Johnny Polite Memorial Foundation$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 26%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 26%Desha County Arkansas: $12k → 28%Cornerstone Christian Academy: $2k → 28%Cornerstone Christian Academy: $2k → 28%Wallace Trust Foundation: $300k → 28%Wallace Trust Foundation: $295k → 28%Wallace Trust Foundation: $294k → 28%Wallace Trust Foundation: $293k → 28%Wallace Trust Foundation: $286k → 28%McGehee Hospital Foundation: $124k → 28%McGehee Hospital Foundation: $122k → 28%McGehee Hospital Foundation: $121k → 28%McGehee Hospital Foundation: $117k → 28%Boys Girls Club of McGehee: $52k → 28%Boys Girls Club of Southeast AR: $50k → 28%Boys Girls Club of Southeast AR: $50k → 28%Boys Girls Club of Southeast AR: $50k → 28%McGehee Food Pantry: $36k → 28%McGehee Food Pantry: $31k → 28%Salvation Army: $25k → 28%Salvation Army: $25k → 28%McGehee Cemetery Assoc: $20k → 28%McGehee Food Pantry: $20k → 28%First Baptist Church Memorial Kitch: $19k → 28%McGehee Cemetery Assoc: $17k → 28%First Baptist Church Memorial Kitch: $15k → 28%City of McGehee OwlfestFlood Disast: $13k → 28%City of McGehee AR: $11k → 28%McGehee Food Pantry: $11k → 28%Wallace Trust Foundation: $11k → 28%McGehee Cemetery Assoc: $10k → 28%McGehee Cemetery Assoc: $9k → 28%Paws Claws: $8k → 28%McGehee Industrial Foundation: $5k → 28%McGehee Men's Club: $5k → 28%McGehee Men's Club: $5k → 28%Foundation for Boys Girls Club of M: $5k → 28%Foundation for Boys Girls Club of M: $5k → 28%McGehee Men's Club: $5k → 28%Paws Claws: $5k → 28%McGehee Men's Club: $5k → 28%Foundation for Boys Girls Club of M: $5k → 28%Women's Service League: $3k → 28%McGehee Fallen Firefighters Memoria: $3k → 28%Women's Service League: $3k → 28%McGehee Fallen Firefighters Memoria: $3k → 28%Women's Service League: $3k → 28%First Presbyterian Church: $3k → 28%McGehee Parks Recreation: $2k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 23 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$2.6M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-78%
0%

Still filing today

26%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    Wallace Trust Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.5M · revenue -96% · 100% of their budget
  • MH
    McGehee Hospital Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $485k
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Arkansas
    4× · 2022–2025 · $202k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • CO
    City of McGehee AR
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • 1C
    1408 Crooked Bayou Drive
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • MC
    McGehee Chamber of Commerce
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mcgee Foundation
—
2
The Mcgee Foundation
—
3
Arkansas Bankers Association Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Parks and Recreation Foundation of Arkansas

Parks and Recreation Foundation of Arkansas is organized to support, protect, enhance and add value to places that provide exceptional recreation experience and build on the legacy of the civilian conservation corps by providing a conduit…

Recreation & Sports
5
Mcgehee-Desha Co Hospital Foundation

To foster support and encourage the activities and purposes of mcgehee hospital.

—
6
Murray Rotary Club Foundation
—
7
Agc of Missouri Education Foundation
Education
8
Gk Grout Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Mgg Foundation
Philanthropy
10
M B Gale Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Arch Eagle Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Main Street Searcy Inc

To promote the historic preservation and restoration of downtown Searcy, Arkansas.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Boys & Girls Club of McGehee Arkansas; the most unlike its peers is Wallace Trust Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wallace Trust Foundation: $1,479,999 · OtherWallace Trust FoundationMcGehee Hospital Foundation: $484,614 · OtherMcGehee Hospital FoundationUAM Foundation: $100,000 · OtherMcGehee Food Pantry: $98,000 · Other+20 more: $231,417 · Other+20 moreBoys & Girls Club of Southeast Arkansas: $201,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Gi…Foundation for Boys & Girls Club of McGehee Arkansas: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentFoundatio…McGehee Mens Club Inc: $20,000 · EducationCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $4,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · Education
Other$2,394,030Youth Development$216,500Education$24,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWallace Trust Foundation: $1,479,999 over 6y, 100% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Southeast Arkansas: $201,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetMCGEHEE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $55,500 over 4y, 35% of budgetMcGehee Mens Club Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetFoundation for Boys & Girls Club of McGehee Arkansas: $15,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMcGehee Industrial Foundation: $5,800 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetALEX FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wallace Trust Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Arkansas ↗
  • Who funds MCGEHEE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds McGehee Mens Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Boys & Girls Club of McGehee Arkansas ↗
  • Who funds McGehee Industrial Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEX FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wallace Trust FoundationAR15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wallace Trust Foundation · Frank D Hickingbotham Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph Francis Wallace Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph Francis Wallace Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph Francis Wallace Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph Francis Wallace Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph Francis Wallace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph