Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

North Carolina · Private foundation

Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
6
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$75,999
States reached, FY2023
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
St Marys Episcopal Church$75,9991n/a
Hospice of the Piedmont Inc$75,00010%
High Point Regional Health Foundation$30,00011%
Senior Resources of Guilford$25,00011%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($55k), not named here.

Compare Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation with peer funders

About Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation

How much does Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation give?
Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $260,999 in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Health (40%), Human Services (31%), Religion (29%).
Who are Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: St Marys Episcopal Church ($76k), Hospice of the Piedmont Inc ($75k), High Point Regional Health Foundation ($30k).
Does Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation based?
Joseph a and Marianne B Hayworth Foundation is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home