Skip to content

· Private foundation

Johnston Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$48kHealth$44kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$8kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$246k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$4,000
RACHEL'S CHALLENGE$4,000
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$286
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RACHEL'S CHALLENGE: $4k → 8%RACHEL'S CHALLENGE: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
CO
NE
MO
AZ
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 5 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$58k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-21%

Still filing today

80%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    Creighton University
    4× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +48%
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $20k · revenue -19%
  • RC
    RACHEL'S CHALLENGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -33%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY CATHOLIC EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JAMES ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
4
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Southern California University of Health Sciences

To educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics, scholarship, service and leadership through its offerings of bachelor,…

Education
7
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
12
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Rise Up Industries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLCRISTO REY CATHOLIC EDUCATION: $5,000 · OtherCRISTO REY CATHOLIC EDUCATIONST JAMES ACADEMY: $5,000 · OtherST JAMES ACADEMYSALK INSTITUTE: $5,000 · OtherSALK INSTITUTEAMERICAN STROKE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN STROKE ASSOCIATIONBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF SAN DIEGORIVERSIDE COUNTY BENEVOLENT FUND: $4,500 · OtherRIVERSIDE COUNTY BENEVOLENT FUNDRESTORATIVE JUSTICE MEDIATION PROGR: $3,000 · OtherRESTORATIVE JUSTICE MEDIATION PROGRRETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS: $3,000 · OtherRETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUSINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+6 more: $5,286 · Other+6 morePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $19,500 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NE…CITY OF HOPE: $6,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPESCRIPPS HEALTH: $4,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTHCreighton University: $20,000 · EducationCreighton UniversityPATRICK'S PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationPATRICK'S PURPOSE FOUNDAT…NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC: $2,500 · EducationNATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF …RACHEL'S CHALLENGE: $8,000 · Human ServicesMEGAN MEIER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$50,286Health$29,500Education$27,500Human Services$8,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreighton University: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRACHEL'S CHALLENGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEGAN MEIER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPATRICK'S PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MEGAN MEIER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PATRICK'S PURPOSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnston Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnston Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johnston Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph