Skip to content
Johnson Community Assistance Founda at a glance

· Private foundation

Johnson Community Assistance Founda

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$64kEducation$31kRecreation & Sports$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kMembership Benefit$10kYouth Development$1kReligion$1kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LATTA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PEE DEE COUNCIL OF REGIONAL GOVTS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
DILLON COUNTY PUBLIC PRIVATE ECONOM$1,000
CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER$500
LATTA BASEBALL 12U ALLSTARS$500
LATTA PARKS AND RECREATION$500
PEE DEE COALITION$300
MAIN ST METHODIST MEN$240
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 29%, against an area that typically sits at 30%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 30%CHARLESTON SOUTHERN: $5k → 12%PEE DEE COUNCIL OF REGIONAL GOVTS: $1k → 20%LATTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $38k → 30%PEE DEE ACADEMY: $2k → 32%WALLACE GREGG ELEMENTARY: $3k → 20%LATTA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 30%LATTA PARKS AND RECREATION: $8k → 30%LATTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 30%TOWN OF LATTA: $5k → 30%LATTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 30%LATTA RESCUE SQUAD: $5k → 30%LATTA HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 30%LATTA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 30%JOHN JUNE: $1k → 30%JEFF HUGGINS: $1k → 30%LATTA 14U ALLSTARS: $1k → 30%LATTA BASEBALL: $1k → 30%LATTA PARKS AND RECREATION: $500 → 30%CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $500 → 30%CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $500 → 30%LATTA BASEBALL 12U ALLSTARS: $500 → 30%GIRL SCOUT TROOP 1203: $300 → 30%FRIENDS OF DILLON COUNTY LIBRARY: $5k → 30%LATTA SCHOOLS BAND: $300 → 30%OAK GROVE FIRE DEPT: $5k → 30%LATTA BAPTIST CHURCH: $250 → 30%DILLON COUNTY PUBLIC PRIVATE ECONOM: $1k → 30%LATTA METHODIST CHURCH: $240 → 30%DILLON COUNTY MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $500 → 30%OAK GROVE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $100 → 30%MAIN ST METHODIST MEN: $240 → 30%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 7 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
34

Total granted

$87k
$74k

Still filing today

0%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LATTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    3× · 2017–2019 · $48k
  • LP
    LATTA PARKS AND RECREATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k
  • MM
    MONTE MINCY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LH
    LATTA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • LR
    LATTA RESCUE SQUAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LATTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $48,331 · OtherLATTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCHLATTA CEMETARY ASSN INC: $10,000 · OtherLATTA CEMETARY ASSN INCLATTA PARKS AND RECREATION: $8,789 · OtherMONTE MINCY: $8,000 · OtherRICHARD AND LILY MAE JACKSON: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+44 more: $89,880 · Other+44 more
Other$181,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEE DEE ACADEMY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEE DEE ACADEMY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnson Community Assistance Founda funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnson Community Assistance Founda. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johnson Community Assistance Founda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home