Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Treacy and Darcy F Beyer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$165kArts & Culture$152kEducation$113kScience & Tech$42kRecreation & Sports$19kReligion$10kHuman Services$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
$17,700
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
DATA2 INC$25,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND$17,700
TRUSTEES OF HAMILTON COLLEGE$10,000
THE BRIDGE FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT ATHLETES$9,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 7%CHILDRENS AID SOCITEY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 8 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$388k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+30%

Still filing today

63%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YN
    YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +75%
  • BT
    BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $64k · revenue +10%
  • RC
    RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2022 · $48k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • TS
    THORACIC SURGERY AND ESOPHAGEAL
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • PI
    PILOBOLUS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Ballet Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Foundation for Courtauld Instit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR COURTAULD INSTIT: $65,044 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR COURTAULD INSTITIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDREAM: $26,500 · OtherDREAMDATA 2 INC: $25,000 · OtherDATA 2 INCBRIDGE FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC: $19,300 · OtherBRIDGE FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT ATHLETES I…THORACIC SURGERY AND ESOPHAGEAL: $12,500 · OtherTHORACIC SURGERY AND ESOPHAGEALYALE UNIVERSITY: $10,250 · OtherST JOHNS CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $48,000 · EducationRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $41,650 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harv…Trustees of Hamilton College: $30,000 · EducationTrustees of Hamilton CollegeVanderbilt University: $25,000 · EducationVanderbilt University+1 more: $3,000 · EducationYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $110,045 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPIT…BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $64,140 · Arts & CultureBALLET THEATRE F…PILOBOLUS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePILOBOLUS INCPALAZZO STROZZI FOUNDATION USA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePALAZZO STROZZI …AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $17,700 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM RBI INC: $3,500 · Philanthropy
Other$203,594Education$147,650Health$110,045Arts & Culture$84,140Human Services$27,700Philanthropy$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $110,045 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR COURTAULD INSTIT: $65,044 over 4y, 11% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $64,140 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $48,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $41,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $17,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPILOBOLUS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALAZZO STROZZI FOUNDATION USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHARLEM RBI INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH BALLET ACADEMY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Treacy and Darcy F Beyer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Treacy and Darcy F Beyer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Pilobolus Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Treacy and Darcy F Beyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph