Skip to content

· Private foundation

John M & Gertrude E Petersen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$961k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.0MEducation$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.1MYouth Development$988kInternational$564kHealth$310kReligion$257kEnvironment$160kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $385k
  • $250k+1 grant · $425k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN$425,000
AFRICA 6000$205,440
SIGHT CENTER NWPA$100,000
HARBORCREEK YOUTH SERVICES$80,000
COMMUNITY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$45,500
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS$25,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN PA$20,000
FAMILY HOUSE$15,000
ERIE CITY MISSION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF ERIE COUNTY$10,000
EMMAUS MINISTRIES INC$5,000
INNER CITY NEIGHBORHOOD ART HOUSE$5,000
SAINT PAUL'S NEIGHBORHOOD FREE$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ERIE INC$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $587k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $355k → 14%FAMILY SERVICES OF NWPA: $100k → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%BETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $74k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%BETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $26k → 14%FAMILY SERVICES OF NWPA: $5k → 15%ST MARTIN CENTER: $15k → 15%ST MARTIN CENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 30 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
8

Total granted

$8.9M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+18%

Still filing today

50%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +197% · 33% of their budget
  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +26%
  • HY
    Harborcreek Youth Services Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $755k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • A6
    AFRICA 6000 INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
  • EC
    ERIE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Erie Homes for Children & Adults Inc

Erie homes for children and adults operates as a private, non-profit agency providing programs for individuals with intellectual and physical disabilities.

Health
2
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
3
Carriage House Children's Center Inc

The primary purpose of the organization is to provide structured day care programs for pre-school children. the organization is dedicated to the nurturing, care and education of infants, toddlers, and pre-school children. the center owns…

Human Services
4
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
5
The Caring Center

Early education and child care services

Human Services
6
Children's Aid Society of Mercer County

To provide information, counseling, and such services as may be appropriate to families or others in raising and nuturing children.

—
7
Family Help Center Inc

To engage in development of a self-help crisis intervention program to serve families mainly in erie county with abusive or potentially abusive family problems.

Crime & Legal
8
Erie Independence House Inc

Erie Independence House, Inc. (EIH) exists to enhance and promote independence in people with disabilities through the provision of accessible, affordable, adaptive housing necessary for them to lead productive, independent lives. We offer…

—
9
The Childrens Aid Home Programs of Somerset County Inc

Our mission is to provide a continuum of quality services which promote the emotional, behavioral, educational, and physical development of children, adolescents and their families.

Human Services
10
Catholic Charities Counseling & Adoption Services of the Diocese of Erie Inc

Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance

—
11
Family Health Council of Central Pa Inc

The mission of the family health council of central pennsylvania, inc. (fhccp) is to build and support community-based health networks through partnerships, education, advocacy, and effective resource allocation.

Health
12
Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh Relief Nursery

Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Nw Pa; the most unlike its peers is Erie Zoological Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $1,250,000 · OtherMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INCHarborcreek Youth Services Inc: $755,000 · OtherHarborcreek Youth Services IncAFRICA 6000: $504,940 · OtherAFRICA 6000PENN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP: $400,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIPCOMMUNITY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $361,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL+23 more: $1,473,686 · Other+23 moreFAMILY HOUSE INC: $1,075,000 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE …+2 more: $15,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $667,000 · EducationBETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $455,325 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NW PA: $105,000 · Human Services+2 more: $27,142 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Erie County: $90,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ERIE INC: $36,000 · Youth DevelopmentErie Zoological Society: $10,000 · Animals
Other$6,744,626Health$1,090,000Education$667,000Human Services$587,467Philanthropy$90,000Youth Development$36,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $1,250,000 over 9y, 33% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $1,075,000 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetHarborcreek Youth Services Inc: $755,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $667,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $455,325 over 3y, 22% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $361,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetASBURY WOODS PARTNERSHIP INC: $160,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NW PA: $105,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Way of Erie County: $90,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCITY MISSION OF THE EVANGELICAL CHURCHES OF ERIE: $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ERIE INC: $36,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Martin Center: $17,142 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetErie Zoological Society: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDR GERTRUDE A BARBER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Harborcreek Youth Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY WOODS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NW PA ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Erie County ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION OF THE EVANGELICAL CHURCHES OF ERIE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ERIE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds St Martin Center ↗
  • Who funds Erie Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds DR GERTRUDE A BARBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Surgala TrPA32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Surgala Tr · Erie Community Foundation · Wabtec Foundation · The Britton Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Merwin Foundation · Kern Family Foundation Inc · Northwest Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vorsheck Family Foundation Inc · Charles a Dailey Foundation · United Way of Erie County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John M & Gertrude E Petersen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John M & Gertrude E Petersen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John M & Gertrude E Petersen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John M & Gertrude E Petersen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John M & Gertrude E Petersen’s filings →

More from the funding graph