How much did JOHN H & WILHELMINA D HARLAND grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of JOHN H & WILHELMINA D HARLAND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

capitalcurrenthopekeysgideons elementaryatlantalearning

2020

current covidcovid emergencyemergency assistanacesummeratlantaearlychildren's

2021

recipient activities

2022

recipient activities

2023

recipient activities

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k38 grants · $975k
$50k–250k3 grants · $225k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$38M

Total assets

Largest grants

WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA$75,000
OPEN HAND$50,000
ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION$35,000
COOL GIRLS$35,000
FAMILIES FIRST$30,000
EAST ATLANTA KIDS CLUB$25,000
GATEWAY CENTER$25,000
GEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT$25,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$25,000
CHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER$25,000
CARINGWORKS INC$25,000
KIDZ2LEADERS$25,000
SYNCHRONICITY THEATRE$25,000
CROSSROADS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $859k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.0M · 67 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

67 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.0M

$970k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

+56%

Still filing today

76%

64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CC
CROSSROADS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
4× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +145%
GJ
GEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT
4× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +59%
OH
OUR HOUSE
4× · 2019–2023 · $95k · revenue +64%

Funded once

AS
ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL
one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +18%
AB
ATLANTA BALLET
one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -5%
SA
SHELTERING ARMS
one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Life House Atlanta Inc

Human Services

The Atlanta Girls' School Inc

Inspiring girls to lead lives of purpose.

—

Atlanta Association of Legal

—

Arts Critic Atl Inc

Arts atl is a non-profit organization that promotes a healthy and vibrant arts community in metro atlanta.

—

Georgia Center for Child Advocacy Inc

The Georgia center for child advocacy's mission is to champion the needs of sexually and severely physically abused children through prevention, intervention, therapy, and collaboration.

Human Services

Thrive Academy Atlanta Inc

Thrive Academy is a boarding school in the inner city of Atlanta GA reaching at risk youth. We use education, student housing, and intentional staff/student relationships to help break generational cycles of poverty and trauma.

Education

United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc

United way of greater atlanta engages and brings together people and resources to drive sustainable and equitable improvements in the well-being of children, families, and individuals in the community. for individuals and organizations…

Philanthropy

Atlanta Woman's Club

To encourage our members to become interested, involved citizens of the community by engaging in the charitable activities that benefit the community as a whole.

Community Improvement

Atlanta Court Appointed Special

Atlanta Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc.'s mission: To educate the community and to recruit, train and supervise court appointed volunteers to advocate for the best interest, safety and permanent placement of abused and neglected…

Civil Rights

Girls Inc of Greater Atlanta Inc

Our mission at Girls Incorporated of Greater Atlanta (GIGA) is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. Our programs are evidence-based, aligned with the national Girls Incorporated evaluations, and tailored to meet the unique…

Youth Development

Georgia Court Appointed Special

develops and supports court-sanctioned, community-based affiliate programs that provide trained and supervised volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children involved in juvenile court dependency proceedings.

Civil Rights

Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc

Girl Scouting builds girls of courage, confidence & character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Children's Shelter Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Nobis Works Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 32% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/79

the rest of the field

18%

1,873/10,381

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

79 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

78/79

Grantees still filing

69/79

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,295,000Human Services$908,500Youth Development$670,000Health$440,000Arts & Culture$415,000Education$340,000Crime & Legal$305,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Imlay Foundation IncGA113.7× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Imlay Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · AEC Trust · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN H & WILHELMINA D HARLAND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DANCE CANVAS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +62% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 262425825 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DANCE CANVAS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John H & Wilhelmina D Harland?

Find your warmest path to John H & Wilhelmina D Harland through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN H & WILHELMINA D HARLAND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

79 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John H & Wilhelmina D Harland?

More from the funding graph

JOHN H & WILHELMINA D HARLAND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

79 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John H & Wilhelmina D Harland?

More from the funding graph