Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$645k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$156kReligion$108kEducation$105kHuman Services$79kYouth Development$62kPhilanthropy$35kFood & Nutrition$30kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $260k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIFFLINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT TF$100,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOUSE$60,000
WELLSPAN EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSP$50,000
SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY$50,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$30,000
KREMER CARES$30,000
MIFFLINBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$30,000
MIFFLINBURG HOSE COMPANY$25,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
TRANSITIONS OF PA$15,000
LYCOMING COLLEGE$10,000
CAMP KOALA$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $10k → 10%CAMP KOALA: $10k → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$353k · 12 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
31

Total granted

$353k
$441k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $560k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’23’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Salvation Army
    3× · 2018–2025 · $100k
  • MU
    Mifflinburg UM Church
    2× · 2018–2023 · $80k
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    2× · 2023–2025 · $35k

Funded once

  • SU
    Susquehanna University
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • LC
    Lycoming College
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • SJ
    ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HO
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennsylvania State Police Camp Cadet of Lancaster County
—
2
Southeastern Pennsylvania Air Force Academy Parents Association
—
3
Girl Scouts Western Pennsylvania

As the preeminent leadership experience for girls in grades k-12, girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
4
Girl Scouts of Eastern Pennsylvania Inc

Girl scouts of eastern pennsylvania, inc. (gsep) builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
5
The Sexual Assault Resource & Counseling Center of Lebanon & Schuylkill Cou

Sarccs mission is to prevent sexual violence and promote healing for those impacted.

—
6
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
7
Susquehanna Heritage Corporation

As a designated national and state heritage area, susquehanna heritage corporation works to raise awareness and appreciation of the cultural and economic value of the susquehanna riverlands, and preserve, enhance and celebrate the area's…

Community Improvement
8
Southwestern Pa Corporation

To organize, manage, and supervise southwestern pa commission. to plan, form, promote, and coordinate transportation and economic development of the southwest pa region. to further develop intergovernmental and intermunicipal cooperation.

Public Benefit
9
Lebanon Valley College

Lebanon valley college educates students for lifelong success through exceptional undergraduate liberal-arts programs and professional graduate programs delivered in an engaging and supportive academic and co-curricular environment.…

Education
10
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
11
Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution
—
12
Girl Scouts of Central Illinois

Girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Susquehanna Valley Chorale; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
6/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Salvation Army: $100,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyMIFFLINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT TF: $100,000 · OtherMIFFLINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT TFMifflinburg UM Church: $80,000 · OtherMifflinburg UM ChurchSusquehanna University: $75,000 · OtherSusquehanna UniversityLycoming College: $60,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOUSE: $60,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HO: $50,000 · OtherWELLSPAN EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSP: $50,000 · OtherEvangelical Community Hospital: $50,000 · Other+53 more: $532,500 · Other+53 moreSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationLYCOMING COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationTRANSITIONS OF PA: $15,000 · Human ServicesREGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAMP KOALA: $10,000 · Human ServicesMIFFLINBURG HOSE COMPANY #1: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEXPECTATIONS WOMENS CENTER: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthGIRLS INCORPORATED: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL INC #533: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CHORALE: $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,157,500Education$90,000Human Services$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Health$20,000Youth Development$20,000Arts & Culture$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSITIONS OF PA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEXPECTATIONS WOMENS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CHORALE: $6,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL INC #533: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUMMER SEALS DAY CAMP: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIFFLINBURG HOSE COMPANY #1 ↗
  • Who funds TRANSITIONS OF PA ↗
  • Who funds EXPECTATIONS WOMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph