Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John C Goldsmith and Nancy L Goldsmith Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$489kReligion$130kHealth$46kFood & Nutrition$45kHousing & Shelter$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
$21,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$30,000
Individual grant recipient$21,000
BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY$10,000
SULAM$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SULAM: $7k → 8%SULAM: $7k → 8%SULAM: $7k → 8%SULAM: $7k → 8%SULAM: $7k → 8%SULAM: $7k → 8%SULAM: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$855k · 11 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$855k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+62%

Still filing today

55%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +72%
  • SI
    Sulam Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $46k · revenue +9%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AB
    ALEF BET MONTESSORI SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +62%
  • SO
    SO OTHERS MY EAT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
12
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sulam Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND — $240,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLEL — $130,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLELIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSO OTHERS MAY EAT(SOME) — $41,000 · OtherSO OTHERS MAY EAT(SOME)+1 more — $10,000 · OtherMELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY — $102,952 · ReligionMELVIN J BERM…Sulam Inc — $46,000 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $26,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $11,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionALEF BET MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $25,000 · EducationTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$646,000Religion$102,952Human Services$46,000Health$38,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Education$25,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY — $102,952 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSulam Inc — $46,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALEF BET MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds Sulam Inc
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds ALEF BET MONTESSORI SCHOOL
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John C Goldsmith and Nancy L Goldsmith Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John C Goldsmith and Nancy L Goldsmith Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John C Goldsmith and Nancy L Goldsmith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph