Skip to content

· Private foundation

Johansson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$389k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$294k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$831kEducation$790kRecreation & Sports$178kPhilanthropy$98kFood & Nutrition$41kAnimals$15kReligion$14kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
  • $250k+1 grant · $294k
$12,071
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANAFARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$294,224
MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM$39,229
GREENHOUSE SPORT LTD$14,511
VICTORIA ALBERT MUSEUM$13,588
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS KEW$12,071
ST CLEMENTS$9,234
Individual grant recipient$2,638
KENT PLACE SCHOOL$1,979
BRIGHT IDEAS FOR TENNIS$1,319
Individual grant recipient$660
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 60% of grant dollars ($1.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 40% that went abroad ($794k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DANAFARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $294k → 7%COMM FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY CO: $5k → 12%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $188k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $260k → 11%KENT PLACE SCHOOL: $22k → 10%MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $131k → 17%KENT PLACE SCHOOL: $2k → 10%MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $130k → 17%MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION: $7k → 6%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $124k → 17%MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION: $7k → 6%CITY HARVEST: $41k → 17%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $39k → 17%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $35k → 17%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $35k → 17%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $35k → 17%MORGAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $30k → 17%THE NEW YORK YACHT CLUB: $507 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 40% of all-years giving ($794k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Sweden$441k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$353k · 41 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 13 repeat orgs$711k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +75% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$1.6M
$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+75%

Still filing today

31%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Pierpont Morgan Library
    9× · 2017–2025 · $749k · revenue +109%
  • LC
    LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $51k · revenue +118%
  • TM
    THE MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $42k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $260k · revenue +51%
  • CITY HARVEST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $41k · revenue +75%
  • M
    MOUSETRAP
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
8
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University; the most unlike its peers is The Mousetrap Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Pierpont Morgan Library: $748,592 · EducationThe Pierpont Morgan LibraryDUKE UNIVERSITY: $259,516 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $73,328 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR …+1 more: $27,837 · EducationSTOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY: $427,156 · OtherSTOCKHOLM UNIVERSITYGREEN HOUSE SPORTS: $177,143 · OtherGREEN HOUSE SPORTSVICTORIA & ALBERT MUSEUM: $103,409 · OtherVICTORIA & ALBERT MUSEUM+30 more: $148,136 · Other+30 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $294,224 · HealthDana-Farber C…LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC: $51,018 · PhilanthropyTHE MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION: $41,840 · PhilanthropyCITY HARVEST INC: $40,541 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,109,273Other$855,844Health$294,224Philanthropy$92,858Food & Nutrition$40,541

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $748,592 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $294,224 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $259,516 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $73,328 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC: $51,018 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION: $41,840 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $40,541 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENT PLACE SCHOOL: $27,837 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUSETRAP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds KENT PLACE SCHOOL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johansson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johansson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johansson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph