· Private foundation
Jl Charitable Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k41 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
Largely a single collection: about 92% of reported assets are Property 1.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE OJC FUND | $27,500 |
| KOLLEL VYOEL MOSHE DSATMAR | $9,450 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,300 |
| ACHIEZER | $5,363 |
| MOSDOS RAMOU | $5,252 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CONG YETEV LEV VYOEL MOSHE OF KJ | $4,900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,910 |
| HATZOLAS YEHUDY TAIMON | $3,156 |
| CONG BNAI YOEL INC | $3,072 |
| TOIREM | $2,875 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,432 |
| KEREN CHASUDIM TOVIM INC | $2,397 |
| MOSDOS SATMAR OF BLOOMINGBURG | $2,300 |
| TORAH VCHESED | $2,070 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.
45 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- THTZEDUKAS HUIR INC2× · 2022–2023 · $774 · revenue +26%
- BLBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC3× · 2021–2023 · $770 · revenue +76%
- BVBAIS VAAD LECHACHOMIM YERISHULAYIM INC2× · 2022–2023 · $518 · revenue +105%
Funded once
- CYCONG YETEV LEV OF KJone grant, 2021 · $12k
- OIOYZRS INCone grant, 2021 · $3k
- OYOZER YISROEL INCone grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of religious schools in Israel
Assistance to non profit organizations in israel.
The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence
We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.
publish religious books
Assistance to the indigent
To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable
How this is measured
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust · Bochner Foundation · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Hf Foundation · Nimlach Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Madanim Foundation · I&S Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Jl Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jl Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Jl’s filings →