Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jim and Janet Harvey Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$202kCommunity Improvement$197kHuman Services$165kReligion$105kHousing & Shelter$80kHealth$50kPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$36,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTBOROUGH WOMEN'S CLUB$65,000
ASSABET VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL$36,500
BLACKSTONE VALLEY REGIONAL VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
SMILE TRAIN$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DIGNITY MATTERS: $40k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $30k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $20k → 16%FISHING WITH WARRIORS INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$728k · 11 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$728k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+15%

Still filing today

45%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +52%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • Dignity Matters Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue -8%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +15%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doughty Home for Veteran Women
—
2
Helping Our Troops Massachusetts Inc

Fulfilling the "wish lists" of local soldiers from massachusetts stationed in iraq and afghanistan by providing care packages from home.

Human Services
3
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
4
Worthwhile Wear Inc

Worthwhile wear exists to reach and restore women that have been affected by human trafficking, both labor and sex trafficking, by providing them with comprehensive care, which includes housing, employment, counseling, and various other…

International
5
Fisher House of Boston Inc

To provide and coordinate lodging for our active military, veteran, and retired military families being treated at hospitals in the boston area.

Health
6
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
7
Women in Need Inc

To provide safe housing, critical services, and ground-breaking programs to help homeless women and their children rebuild their lives.

Human Services
8
Wounded Warrior Project Inc

Wounded warrior project (wwp) is the nation's leading veterans service organization providing post-9/11 veterans with life changing programs and services. wwp offers a wide range of programs, services, and resources to help post-9/11…

Human Services
9
Household Goods Inc

Household goods provides a full range of donated furniture and household items, free of charge, to help people in need make a home.

Human Services
10
Downtown Women's Center

Housing, employment, and physical and mental health services for women overcoming homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
11
Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans

The mission of the new england center and home for veterans (nechv) isto equip veterans who are facing or at-risk of homelessness with thetools for economic self-sufficiency and to provide them a path toachieve successful and dignified…

Housing & Shelter
12
Wounded Solders of Republic of Vietnam

Helping the wounded soldiers

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abby Kelley Foster House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSABET VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL: $176,500 · OtherASSABET VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOLSMILE TRAIN INC: $50,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WESTBOROUGH: $40,000 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WESTBOROUGHGENESIS CLUB: $40,000 · OtherGENESIS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSILOAM MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherSILOAM MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCBLACKSTONE VALLEY REGIONAL VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherSHRINERS: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $20,000 · OtherSEMPER K9: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherWESTBOROUGH WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $196,500 · Community ImprovementWESTBOROUGH WOMEN'S CLUB …THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITT…Dignity Matters Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesDignity Matters I…CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYON…FISHING WITH WARRIORS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFISHING WITH WARR…HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR …ABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterABBY KELLE…
Other$471,500Community Improvement$196,500Human Services$140,000Housing & Shelter$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTBOROUGH WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $196,500 over 3y, 72% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFISHING WITH WARRIORS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetVINCENT F PICARD AMERICAN LEGION POST #234: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTBOROUGH WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Dignity Matters Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHING WITH WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds VINCENT F PICARD AMERICAN LEGION POST #234 ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim and Janet Harvey Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim and Janet Harvey Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jim and Janet Harvey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph