Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

JHC Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Food & Nutrition$17MEducation$12MReligion$3.1MHuman Services$1.1MEnvironment$1.0MArts & Culture$437kPhilanthropy$390kHealth$60k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+8 grants · $6.0M
$520,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$114M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD FIX CAMPAIGN INC$1,500,000
RODALE INSTITUTE$1,500,000
WASHINGTON COLLEGE$1,000,000
HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION$525,000
DELONE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$520,000
JUBILEE GIFT GALAXY INC$350,000
DIOCESE OF HARRISBURG$325,000
FOOD CONNECT CO$280,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$200,000
NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION A$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KEYSTONE KIDSPACE: $100k → 9%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $200k → 19%KEYSTONE KIDSPACE: $100k → 9%KEYSTONE KIDSPACE: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of JHC Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

JHC Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33M · 16 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +103% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$33M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    Rodale Institute
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +103%
  • WC
    WASHINGTON COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +32%
  • HP
    HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $600k · revenue +40%
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $400k
  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Pennsylvania

Feeding pennsylvania is the partner state association of feeding america food banks. it is our mission to promote and aid our members in securing food and other resources to reduce hunger and food insecurity for their communities and…

Philanthropy
3
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
4
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
5
Second Harvest Food Bank of Nw Pa Inc

The mission of the second harvest food bank of northwest pennsylvania is to provide food to those in need within eleven counties of northwest pennsylvania while creating awareness and educating the community on the realities of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Montco Anti-Hunger Network

By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Rodale Institute — $7,500,000 · Food & NutritionRodale InstituteFOOD FIX CAMPAIGN INC — $6,500,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FIX CAMPAIGN INCFOOD CONNECT CO — $2,030,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD CONNECT COFeeding America — $600,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $172,000 · Food & NutritionDELONE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $3,170,000 · OtherDELONE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLDIOCESE OF HARRISBURG — $1,925,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF HARRISBURGHANOVER AREA COUNCIL OF CHURCHES — $1,200,000 · OtherHANOVER AREA COUNCIL OF CHU…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - SOUTH EAST PA OFFICE — $600,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY - SO…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $429,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · OtherHANOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC — $372,000 · Other+1 more — $275,000 · OtherWASHINGTON COLLEGE — $5,500,000 · EducationWASHINGTON COLLEGEHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION — $2,625,000 · EducationHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCA…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA — $600,000 · EnvironmentKEYSTONE KIDSPACE — $300,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesJubilee Gift Galaxy Inc — $350,000 · PhilanthropyYORK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION — $65,000 · Arts & CultureSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $60,000 · Health
Food & Nutrition$16,802,000Other$8,371,000Education$8,125,000Environment$600,000Human Services$500,000Philanthropy$390,000Arts & Culture$65,000Health$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRodale Institute — $7,500,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetFOOD FIX CAMPAIGN INC — $6,500,000 over 5y, 80% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE — $5,500,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION — $2,625,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetFOOD CONNECT CO — $2,030,000 over 5y, 37% of budgetFeeding America — $600,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA — $600,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $429,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC — $372,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetJubilee Gift Galaxy Inc — $350,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetKEYSTONE KIDSPACE — $300,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $275,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPhilabundance — $172,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION — $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $60,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetYORK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rodale Institute
  • Who funds FOOD FIX CAMPAIGN INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION
  • Who funds FOOD CONNECT CO
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds HANOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Jubilee Gift Galaxy Inc
  • Who funds KEYSTONE KIDSPACE
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds Philabundance
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

York County Community FoundationPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: York County Community Foundation · Way Foundation Inc · United Way of York County · The Stewart Foundation · The Arthur J and Lee R Glatfelter Foundation · Kinsley Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · Community Aid Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization JHC Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc19% of income from government
  • Washington College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to JHC Foundation?

Find your warmest path to JHC Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph