Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Michigan · Public charity

Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network

The organization works to ensure that no jewish patient or family faces terminal illness alone. From the time of a life-limiting diagnosis, the organization helps those it serves gain access to care navigation, spiritual care, life enrichments, grief support, and other needed resources compatible with their own jewish identity, practice,…

$27k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$27,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$27,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$23M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Jewish Family Service$27,00010%
Bais Haknesses Hagra$20,5801n/a
Gye Corp$12,00010%
Association of Chesed Organizations$7,50014%
Congregation Chasadim Tovim Inc$6,5001n/a

Compare Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network with peer funders

About Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network

How much does Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network give?
Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network reported 1 grants totaling $27,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Community Improvement (44%), Religion (30%), Human Services (26%).
Who are Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Jewish Family Service ($27k), Bais Haknesses Hagra ($21k), Gye Corp ($12k).
Where is Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network based?
Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home