Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of San Diego County

JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

$5.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$691k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$11MYouth Development$5.2MInternational$3.2MHuman Services$1.3MReligion$1.0MEducation$902kPublic Safety & Disaster$741kCivil Rights$635kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 51 grants below total $2,744,293, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,716,640 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,972,347 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $525k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $867k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$15,555
Median grant
6
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$690,875
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$324,602
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$250,214
LAWRENCE FAMILY JCC$211,750
HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO$120,000
JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$100,000
KAVOD - JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS$100,000
KEN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$94,940
THE JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$81,438
SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY$55,306
AJC SAN DIEGO$53,500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$50,000
CAMP MOUNTAIN CHAI$44,360
JEWISH FAMILY SEVICE$43,958
SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%KAVOD - JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $140k → 17%KAVOD: $125k → 17%KAVOD - JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $100k → 17%ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL: $6k → 14%KAVOD - JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $80k → 17%KAVOD: $85k → 12%KAVOD: $69k → 12%JEWISH GIFT CLOSET: $5k → 11%IMPACT CUBED: $45k → 11%IMPACT CUBED: $20k → 11%IMPACT CUBED: $18k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $131k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SEVICE: $62k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $56k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SEVICE: $44k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $34k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SEVICE: $33k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $26k → 11%KINDNESS INITIATIVE: $38k → 11%IMPACT CUBED: $20k → 11%IMPACT CUBED: $15k → 11%KINDNESS INITIATIVE: $21k → 11%KINDNESS INITIATIVE: $19k → 11%KINDNESS INITIATIVE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
CA
CO
MD
DE
TN
DC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $2.1M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$2.1M · 100% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · SERVING THE NEEDY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 43 repeat orgs$528k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
25

Total granted

$13M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+10%

Still filing today

70%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +21%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +24%
  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • AA
    ACCESSIBILITY ACCELERATOR INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0% · 29% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +10%
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU-EL
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
6
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
7
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
8
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shalom Institute Camp & Conference Center; the most unlike its peers is Leichtag Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
41/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $9,485,348 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $1,235,625 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO+5 more: $292,562 · PhilanthropyLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $2,470,057 · OtherLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH C…HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $267,500 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $267,493 · OtherSOILLE SAN DIEGO HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $261,642 · OtherSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY: $394,790 · OtherSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMYKEN JEWISH COMMUNITY: $209,460 · Other+50 more: $1,349,592 · Other+50 moreThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,657,377 · InternationalThe American Jewish …BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,328,818 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FO…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1,175,627 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FOR IS…+7 more: $285,500 · International+7 moreKAVOD: $599,596 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $502,324 · Human ServicesIMPACT CUBED: $117,500 · Human ServicesKINDNESS INITIATIVE: $87,730 · Human Services+2 more: $11,050 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC- CAMP MT CHAI: $529,262 · ReligionHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $220,000 · ReligionSAN DIEGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $56,000 · Religion+2 more: $27,500 · ReligionSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $659,417 · Public Safety & DisasterANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $465,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $113,500 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$11,013,535Other$5,220,534International$4,447,322Human Services$1,318,200Religion$832,762Public Safety & Disaster$659,417Civil Rights$578,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $9,485,348 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $2,470,057 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,657,377 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,328,818 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $1,235,625 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1,175,627 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $659,417 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKAVOD: $599,596 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC- CAMP MT CHAI: $529,262 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $502,324 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $465,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY: $394,790 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $267,500 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetSOILLE SAN DIEGO HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $261,642 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $220,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKEN JEWISH COMMUNITY: $209,460 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetIMPACT CUBED: $117,500 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $113,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $108,750 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetACCESSIBILITY ACCELERATOR INC: $100,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINDNESS INITIATIVE: $87,730 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetLEICHTAG FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSEACREST FOUNDATION: $70,567 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN DIEGO: $62,237 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetSAN DIEGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $56,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $34,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSCY HIGH TECH INC: $32,450 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTORAH HIGH SCHOOLS OF SAN DIEGO: $31,672 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUJF HOLDINGS CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $19,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Butterfly Project: $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFJC: $11,732 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABONIM DROR FOUNDATION INC: $10,800 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetTHE SHIMON BEN JOSEPH FOUNDATION DBA JIM JOSEPH FOUNDATION: $10,557 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHadassah The Women's Zionist Org of America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $9,240 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHabonim Labor Zionist Youth Inc: $7,900 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $7,380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL ROOTS FARM: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL: $6,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds KAVOD ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC- CAMP MT CHAI ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SOILLE SAN DIEGO HEBREW DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEN JEWISH COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT CUBED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSIBILITY ACCELERATOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds KINDNESS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds LEICHTAG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds SEACREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds SCY HIGH TECH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA66.6× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Leichtag Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Isakow Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The San Diego Foundation · Stern Leichter Foundation · Chortek Weisman Family Foundation · Spielman Family Foundation · Allison and Robert Price Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Federation of San Diego County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Federation of San Diego County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Federation of San Diego County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph