Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Tennessee · Public charity

Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation

To build and foster a strong unified jewish community and strive to ensure its well-being and continuity in israel and throughout the world.

$283k
Granted FY2020
2
Itemized grants FY2020
1
Organizations funded FY2020
0%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to The Jewish Federations Of North America Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
1
’18
1
’19
1
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2020
$270k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$262,341
Largest grant, FY2020
$262,341
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
2
Total assets, FY2020
$14M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 0% of the organizations Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20201$8k0%
FY20191$8k0%
FY20181$8k0%
FY20171$14kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$1.5MEducation$38k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chattanooga Joint Community Religious School$38,0004n/a

Compare Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation with peer funders

About Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation

How much does Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation give?
Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation reported 2 itemized grants totaling $270,341, out of $282,791 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (98%), Education (2%).
Who are Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Chattanooga Joint Community Religious School ($38k).
Does Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation based?
Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chattanooga Jewish Welfare Federation’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home