Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jess and Barbara Nicks Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$86kHuman Services$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kFood & Nutrition$28kCommunity Improvement$28kReligion$28kInternational$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE A WISH$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$3,000
CITY OF HOPE$3,000
TEEN LIFELINE$3,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKIN$3,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$3,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$3,000
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$3,000
PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION$3,000
FIBCO FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%CHILDHELP: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$263k · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$263k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+2%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterReligionFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +90%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +145%
  • TL
    Teen Lifeline Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • UC
    UKRAINE CHILDREN'S ACTION PROJECT-
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Phoenix Children's Hospital

To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.

Health
3
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
4
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
5
Crisis Text Line Inc

By leveraging innovative technology and research, we are shaping mental health policy and systems to create a world where everyone has access to the support they need anytime, anywhere.

Health
6
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
7
City Help Inc of Phoenix

Our mission is to reach in and mine the incredible potential we believe lies within the lives of at-risk youth, the homeless, and needy families of our community by restoring hope and allowing them to dream again.

Human Services
8
Solari Inc

To be the trusted leader in improving lives and communities through human connection and innovation

Health
9
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
10
Joseph J Peters Institute

JJPI is a specialized organization that provides prevention and treatment services in the areas of sexual and interpersonal violence, post-traumatic stress disorder and other forms of trauma, infant and early childhood mental health, and…

Crime & Legal
11
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
12
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $28,017 · OtherARIZONA CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA …CITY OF HOPE: $28,016 · OtherCITY OF HOPEALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $22,017 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONMAKE A WISH: $14,500 · OtherMAKE A WISHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $13,517 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY+2 more: $5,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $28,017 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR…CHILDHELP INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $28,017 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J …Teen Lifeline Inc: $28,017 · Public Safety & DisasterTeen Lifeli…PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $28,016 · ReligionPHOENIX GOS…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $28,016 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S F…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,300 · Civil Rights
Other$111,067Human Services$36,517Health$34,017Public Safety & Disaster$28,017Religion$28,016Food & Nutrition$28,016Civil Rights$2,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $28,017 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $28,017 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTeen Lifeline Inc: $28,017 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetARIZONA CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $28,017 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $28,016 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $28,016 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIBCO FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Teen Lifeline Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FIBCO FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jess and Barbara Nicks Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jess and Barbara Nicks Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jess and Barbara Nicks’ filings →

More from the funding graph