Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerome & Barbara Ackerman Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
6
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Jerome & Barbara Ackerman Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Jerome & Barbara Ackerman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $6k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
4
’18
2
’19
1
’20
1
’21
1
’22
2
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$270kReligion$39kHealth$3kArts & Culture$3kHuman Services$443Public Safety & Disaster$300Employment$250Education$180Other$0
02FY2017 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK$3,948
HADASSAH$575
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$500
BOYS TOWN$400
GREAT NECK ESTATE PBA$250
Individual grant recipient$198
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$100
ST JOSEPHS$95
GREAT NECK VIGILAN FIRE CO$50
AIPCA$36
JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS$36
ST JUDES$35
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$18
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $425) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
NJ
CO
NE
KY
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 7 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +145% since the first grant, against +64% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2017, 2 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$46k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+145%
+64%

Still filing today

14%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK
    5× · 2019–2023 · $20k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES
    4× · 2019–2022 · $16k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k

Funded once

  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +160%
  • The Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -98%
  • DR
    DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH
    one grant, 2018 · $417
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
5
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
6
Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc

Draper's engineers design, develop and deploy advanced technology solutions for the world's most difficult and important problems.

Science & Tech
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
American Advertising Federation Inc

American advertising federation, inc. was established to provide leadership and cultivate, promote, and disseminate knowledge and information on issues involving and affecting advertising.

—
9
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
12
American Medical Association Foundation

The ama foundation brings together physicians and communities to improve our nation's health.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $270,044 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDTEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK: $20,395 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF…VARIOUS CHARITIES: $15,649 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIE…TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK: $4,611 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ISRA…HADASSAH: $2,650 · OtherHADASSAHTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $2,200 · Other+9 more: $1,300 · OtherCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $2,644 · Health+1 more: $55 · HealthThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $36 · Arts & CultureFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $400 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 · Human ServicesVIGILANT ENGINE HOOK & LADDER CO INC: $250 · Public Safety & DisasterALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION: $180 · Education
Philanthropy$270,044Other$46,805Health$2,699Arts & Culture$536Human Services$425Public Safety & Disaster$250Education$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $270,044 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $2,644 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIGILANT ENGINE HOOK & LADDER CO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $55 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerome & Barbara Ackerman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerome & Barbara Ackerman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jerome & Barbara Ackerman’s filings →

More from the funding graph