Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jennings Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$569kReligion$246kFood & Nutrition$180kArts & Culture$134kHuman Services$90kHousing & Shelter$47kPublic Benefit$30kPhilanthropy$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$4,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTROSE BD OF EDUCATION$103,400
MONTROSE BAPTIST CHURCH$23,450
MONTROSE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$21,000
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN$14,740
MONTROSE GLOBAL METHODIST CHURCH$13,500
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
MONTROSE FOOD PANTRY$6,500
NORTH END SOUP KITCHEN$6,500
MONTROSE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$5,000
SHOES THAT FIT$4,500
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$4,500
FLINT EASTSIDE MISSION$4,500
SHELTER OF FLINT$4,500
CARRIAGE TOWN MINISTRIES$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHOES THAT FIT: $5k → 14%CROSSOVER OUTREACH: $3k → 16%CROSSOVER OUTREACH: $3k → 16%CROSSOVER OUTREACH: $3k → 16%CROSSOVER DOWNTOWN OUTREACH: $3k → 16%CROSSOVER OUTREACH: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
OH
CA
KY
VA
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 29 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
29

Total granted

$1.1M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+42%

Still filing today

24%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +21%
  • CT
    Carriage Town Ministries
    5× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +38%
  • CO
    CROSSOVER OUTREACH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • C
    CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
2
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
3
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
4
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
5
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
6
Found in Faith Ministries Inc Dba Fresh Start Furnishings

We provide furniture and home goods to families and individuals that financially qualify for our program. our current focus area is harford county, maryland but are happy to give referrals to resources in other counties when possible.

Human Services
7
Feeding Children Everywhere Inc

Feeding children everywhere is committed to providing healthy meals to those in need. we are committed to sustainability. creating a hunger-free world will be possible if we have an awareness of our impact on the world around us. we have…

Food & Nutrition
8
Flint Jewish Federation

To further the welfare of the jewish community

Philanthropy
9
Foundation for Flint

To support and benefit the community foundation of greater flint. the organization will address a wide variety of community needs in greater flint, and its immediate priority is to provide aid to those affected by the flint water crisis.

Philanthropy
10
Greater Cleveland Food Bank Inc

Working together to ensure everyone in our communities has the nutritious food they need every day.

Food & Nutrition
11
Goodwill Industries of Greater Cleveland and East Central Ohio Inc

We empower people on their journey to independence through the sale of donated goods, which supports employment programs and family services.

—
12
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bellevue Veterans Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTROSE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $435,375 · OtherMONTROSE COMMUNITY SCHOOLSMONTROSE BD OF EDUCATION: $103,400 · OtherMONTROSE BD OF EDUCATIONMONTROSE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $81,000 · OtherMONTROSE HISTORICAL SOCIETYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $55,000 · OtherMONTROSE HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $53,000 · OtherCHURCH: $50,000 · Other+50 more: $510,545 · Other+50 moreFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $68,820 · Food & NutritionMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $22,500 · PhilanthropyCROSSOVER OUTREACH: $15,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $4,500 · Human ServicesYWCA OF GREATER FLINT: $3,000 · Human ServicesCarriage Town Ministries: $20,500 · Arts & CultureSHELTER OF FLINT INC: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterMOTHERLY INTERCESSION: $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,288,320Food & Nutrition$68,820Philanthropy$22,500Human Services$22,500Arts & Culture$20,500Housing & Shelter$12,500Crime & Legal$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $68,820 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCarriage Town Ministries: $20,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSOVER OUTREACH: $15,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSHELTER OF FLINT INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMOTHERLY INTERCESSION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGenesee Area Focus Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER FLINT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DICTIONARY PROJECT: $1,344 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE VETERANS CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carriage Town Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER OF FLINT INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERLY INTERCESSION ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Stewart Mott FoundationMI17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Mackey Foundation · Child Welfare Society of Flint · Nartel Family Foundation · The Hagerman Foundation · Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable Trust · Burroughs Memorial Trust · The Whiting Foundation · Anna Paulina Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Flint · Consumers Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jennings Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jennings Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jennings Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jennings Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jennings Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph