· Private foundation
Jeffrey C Kasch Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILWAUKEE PBS | $60,000 |
| MACC FUND (MIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC) | $30,000 |
| SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL ITALIAN CHARITABLE TRUST | $20,000 |
| CREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| THE NATHAN AND ESTHER PELZ HOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER | $15,000 |
| THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC | $10,000 |
| THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL TEAM (MEQUON-THIENSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT) | $5,500 |
| LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD | $5,046 |
| CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $192k · revenue +3%- PCPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC3× · 2017–2020 · $110k · revenue +18%
SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC4× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +36%
Funded once
ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CAREgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +49%- OYOZAUKEE YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +43%
- JKJUDY KERNS PENCE CANCER FUND AT AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2020 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)
To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
The primary purpose of the medical center is to aid and support the development and provision of health services in wisconsin by assisting its members to develop and operate programs of education, research, and patient care. the medical…
Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.
Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.
To promote the welfare of and advance the objectives of the university of wisconsin-madison by encouraging the interest, engagement, and financial support of alumni, donors, and friends in the life of the university and with each other.
The mission of milwaukee area health education center, inc. (ahec) is to increase the diversity and distribution of health professionals through strategic partnerships to improve the health outcomes in southeastern wisconsin.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Extraordinary healthcare from the heart - one person at a time.vision: we will set the standard for community-based healthcare that improves the health and quality of life of the people we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sharon Lynne Wilson Center for the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ITALIAN CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ABCD INC ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS OF SUMMER SELECT BASEBALL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEENS GROW GREENS INC ↗
- Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICE CLUB OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD ↗
- Who funds ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN EDUCATIONAL YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds OZAUKEE YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCI ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER BASKETBALL CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds SHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Kelben Foundation Inc · Northwestern Mutual Life Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jeffrey C Kasch Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jeffrey C Kasch Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jeffrey C Kasch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.