Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jefferson Family Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$1.1MHealth$110kPublic Benefit$105kInternational$36kHuman Services$33kEducation$25kRecreation & Sports$20kArts & Culture$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $235k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$125,000
American Heart Association$110,000
Cape Henlopen Education Foundation$20,000
Black History Observance Comm$15,000
Queen's Chapel United Methodist Church$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cape Henlopen Education Foundation: $20k → 10%SCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN BLACK CULTURE: $1k → 17%American Heart Association: $110k → 14%UNCF: $5k → 14%NEW WAY FELLOWSHIP: $32k → 15%TAYLOR COUNTY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $101k → 20%ON EAGLES WINGS MINISTRIES: $5k → 10%AMERICAN LEGION: $4k → 16%GREATER MT NEBO CHURCH: $113k → 11%THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $1k → 19%GIRL SCOUTS OF THE USA: $5k → 17%Black History Observance Comm: $15k → 14%NEW WAY FELLOWSHIP: $11k → 15%TAYLOR COUNTY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $4k → 20%AMERICAN LEGION: $3k → 16%GREATER MT NEBO CHURCH: $100k → 11%SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CHURCH OF THE FIRSTBORN: $42k → 11%CHURCH OF THE FIRSTBORN: $5k → 11%QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $444k → 11%QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $94k → 11%QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $89k → 11%Queen's Chapel United Methodist Church: $66k → 11%QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $46k → 11%PAN AFRICAN COLLECTIVE: $300k → 11%QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $44k → 11%THE GIFT OF GIVING MEDICAL MISSIONS: $19k → 11%Pan African Collective: $145k → 11%QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $32k → 11%THE GIFT OF GIVING MEDICAL MISSIONS: $12k → 11%Pan African Collective: $125k → 11%Queen's Chapel United Methodist Church: $10k → 11%THE GIFT OF GIVING MEDICAL MISSIONS: $5k → 11%PAN AFRICAN COLLECTIVE: $75k → 11%JTCC: $20k → 11%JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPION CENTER: $10k → 11%JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPION CENTER: $10k → 11%REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IN
MD
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +191% since the first grant, against +99% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$1.9M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+191%
+99%

Still filing today

22%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QC
    QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $825k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2024 · $645k
  • GM
    GREATER MT NEBO CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $213k

Funded once

  • J
    JTCC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • FO
    Fields of Hopegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +214%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

QUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $824,538 · OtherQUEEN'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $645,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER MT NEBO CHURCH — $213,000 · OtherGREATER MT NEBO CHURCHTAYLOR COUNTY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC — $104,900 · OtherTAYLOR COUNTY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC+10 more — $175,313 · Other+10 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc — $110,000 · HealthCAPE HENLOPEN EDUCATIONAL FUND — $20,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $5,000 · EducationJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFields of Hope — $5,000 · Crime & LegalGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,962,751Health$110,000Education$25,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Crime & Legal$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $110,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAPE HENLOPEN EDUCATIONAL FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe American Legion — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFields of Hope — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC
  • Who funds CAPE HENLOPEN EDUCATIONAL FUND
  • Who funds The American Legion
  • Who funds Fields of Hope
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jefferson Family Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Cape Henlopen Educational Fund3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph