Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeff and Shelley Shinn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$82kHealth$28kYouth Development$22kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$6kEnvironment$6kPublic Benefit$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
11
States reached
$375k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$8,000
ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION$7,000
ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY$5,500
OPERATION HEALING FORCES$5,000
THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN$3,800
BROWN UNIVERSITY$2,900
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROCKFORD$2,500
V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$2,000
ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$1,000
PHANTOM REGIMENT$500
FORBES SCHOLARSHIP- UNIVERSITY CLUB OF ROCKFORD$500
YMCA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $5k → 13%YOUTH HAVEN: $1k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $303 → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
RI
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 42 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
28

Total granted

$148k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+17%

Still filing today

45%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +5%
  • RF
    ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +381%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD
    6× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • RP
    ROCKFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

—
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Glaucoma Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD: $12,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORDUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINYMCA: $4,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $4,250 · OtherUW CARBONE CANCER CENTER: $4,000 · OtherTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $3,820 · OtherRVC FOUNDATION: $3,543 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $3,500 · Other+47 more: $29,806 · Other+47 moreROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $46,500 · EducationROCKFORD UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,350 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Education+2 more: $1,250 · EducationROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · PhilanthropyOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,653 · Human ServicesTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $950 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $275 · Health+3 more: $400 · HealthROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $5,900 · EnvironmentANDERSON GARDENS: $400 · EnvironmentBROWN UNIVERSITY: $3,800 · Community ImprovementROCK RIVER DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC A NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$87,919Education$55,600Philanthropy$14,000Human Services$6,653Health$6,625Environment$6,300Community Improvement$5,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $46,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD: $12,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $5,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GEORGIA INC: $2,091 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROCK RIVER DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC A NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,653 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHANTOM REGIMENT INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON GARDENS: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $275 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS' ENSEMBLE THEATER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY CENTER MUSEUM OF ROCKFORD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD ART MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC A NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHANTOM REGIMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · Blazer Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · John & Linda Anderson Charitable Foundation · Jeffrey R Anderson Charitable Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · Javon Bea Hospital · Amended and Restated Brubaker Charitable Trust · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · Ahlstrand Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeff and Shelley Shinn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeff and Shelley Shinn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jeff and Shelley Shinn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jeff and Shelley Shinn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jeff and Shelley Shinn’s filings →

More from the funding graph