· Private foundation
Jb & Kathryn Sallas Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $123k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $99k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOORE FRYE ECKLES SCHOLARSHIP | $74,397 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,003 |
| PINEY WOOD LEO CLUB | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,800 |
| HOUSTON COUNTY SHARE INC | $17,750 |
| CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH | $12,000 |
| JOHN H WOOTERS CROCKETT PUBLIC LIBR | $10,500 |
| FLORENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY EULA HUNT B | $9,500 |
| ADOPT A GRANDPARENT | $9,000 |
| GRAPELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY | $8,000 |
| SCOTT WHITE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $7,711 |
| PEARSON CHAPEL BAPTIST CHURCH | $7,500 |
| LONESTAR MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $7,500 |
| TOYS FOR TOTS | $7,000 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $6,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
73 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PWPiney Woods Fine Arts Association9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +177%
- GCGLENWOOD CEMETERY INC6× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +81%
- RTRitz Theatre Crockett Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +46%
- WBWELDON BAPTIST CHURCHCHone grant, 2017 · $9k
- FOFRIENDS OF HOUSTON COUNTY CHILD WELone grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide fire fighting services to the community surrounding frost tx.
To provide fire protection to ross, texas
Provide fire, medical and mutual aid services.
Volunteer fire department
Fire fighting and fire prevention for the City of Rogers TX
Volunteer fire department
To assist community in time of fire or e
To provide fire protection services in the rio vista area of johnson county, texas
Fighting fires in city and rural areas of blackjack, robertson county, texas, and providing emergency medical services
Fire, medical and other emergency first responders servicing rural brooks county in south texas
The flint-gresham volunteer fire department provides emergency services and fire suppression for the flint-grasham fire district.
Fire Fighting
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Jb & Kathryn Sallas Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jb & Kathryn Sallas Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Jb & Kathryn Sallas’ filings →