Skip to content
Jayasinhala Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jayasinhala Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$17MHealth$15MInternational$7.8MPhilanthropy$67kEducation$36kCivil Rights$6kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$694,196
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI$1,029,500
SRI LANKA FOUNDATION$694,196
THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD$80,522
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRU: $596k → 12%OREGON BUDDHIST VIHARA INC: $50k → 8%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $6.5M → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGYFLAG SERVICE O: $291k → 12%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $6.2M → 14%FLAG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $150k → 12%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $5.6M → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRU: $135k → 12%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $4.3M → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGYFLAG SERVICE O: $104k → 12%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $1.4M → 14%FLAG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $103k → 12%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $1.3M → 14%FLAG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $72k → 12%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRU: $63k → 12%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $1.0M → 14%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $996k → 14%FFSO: $51k → 12%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $958k → 14%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $700k → 14%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $694k → 14%SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $685k → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $640k → 14%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $495k → 14%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $430k → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $410k → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $400k → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $250k → 14%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $200k → 14%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $195k → 14%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $175k → 14%THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUD: $81k → 14%THE POWER OF YOU FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE ADVANCED ORGANIZATION OF LOS AN: $295k → 14%AOLA: $100k → 14%AMERICAN SAINT HILL ORGANIZATION: $74k → 14%AMERICAN SAINT HILL ORGANIZATION: $58k → 14%AMERICAN SAINT HILL ORGANIZATION: $57k → 14%AMERICAN SAINT HILL ORGANIZATION: $52k → 14%SRI LANKA MED ASSOC OF N AMERICA -: $50k → 14%UNITED STATES IAS MEMBERS' TRUST: $232k → 14%UNITED STATES IAS MEMBERS' TRUST: $192k → 14%UNITED STATES IAS MEMBERS' TRUST: $160k → 14%INTL ASSN OF SCIENTOLOGISTS: $50k → 14%CELEBRITY CENTER INTERNATIONAL: $252k → 14%CELEBRITY CENTER INTERNATIONAL: $70k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 17 repeat orgs$691k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$39M
$691k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
-20%

Still filing today

29%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthEducationInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +230% · 100% of their budget
  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUDIES A NON PROFIT CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14M · revenue +69% · 100% of their budget
  • SL
    SRI LANKA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +107% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ADVANCED ORGANIZATION OF LOS AN
    one grant, 2018 · $295k
  • A
    AOLA
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • F
    FFSO
    one grant, 2017 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yoga Dana Foundation
Education
2
Lakhani Family Foundation Lakhani
Philanthropy
3
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
4
The Yogananda Foundation
—
5
Shraman Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Samjivani Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Lotus Land Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Talmudic Commentaries Foundation
—
9
Dadiva Foundation
—
10
Laogai Research Foundation
International
11
Lamrim Foundation
—
12
Matru Bhumi Charity Foundation
Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lankarama Buddhist Institute; the most unlike its peers is The Institute of Buddha Dhamma Studies a Non Profit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUDIES A NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $13,662,022 · PhilanthropyTHE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUDIES A NON PROFIT CORPORATI…SRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $7,764,496 · PhilanthropySRI LANKA FOUNDATION+2 more: $61,334 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,611,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRU: $795,262 · OtherCHURCH OF …UNITED STATES IAS MEMBERS' TRUST: $629,150 · OtherUNITED STA…CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGYFLAG SERVICE O: $394,500 · OtherCHURCH OF …AMERICAN SAINT HILL ORGANIZATION: $360,909 · OtherAMERICAN S…FLAG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $326,000 · OtherFLAG SERVI…CELEBRITY CENTER INTERNATIONAL: $324,500 · OtherCELEBRITY …THE ADVANCED ORGANIZATION OF LOS AN: $294,500 · OtherTHE ADVANC…CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICES: $201,300 · OtherCHURCH OF …+16 more: $427,620 · Other+16 moreLANKARAMA BUDDHIST INSTITUTE: $45,000 · ReligionTHE CALTECH Y: $12,000 · EducationCITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: $6,000 · International
Philanthropy$21,487,852Health$14,611,000Other$3,753,741Religion$45,000Education$12,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,611,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUDIES A NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $13,662,022 over 8y, 100% of budgetSRI LANKA FOUNDATION: $7,764,496 over 8y, 100% of budgetTHE POWER OF YOU FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetLANKARAMA BUDDHIST INSTITUTE: $45,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE CALTECH Y: $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetVIRANI FAMILY FOUNDATION: $11,334 over 1y, 71% of budgetCITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF BUDDHA DHAMMA STUDIES A NON PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SRI LANKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE POWER OF YOU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LANKARAMA BUDDHIST INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE CALTECH Y ↗
  • Who funds VIRANI FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jayasinhala Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jayasinhala Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jayasinhala Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jayasinhala Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jayasinhala’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home