Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Hawaii · Public charity

Japan-America Institute of Management Science

JAPAN-AMERICA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (jaims), a pioneer in intercultural management education, is a private, nonprofit, postgraduate institute. Our mission is to contribute to human capital and community development in the asia-pacific region through knowledge co-creation by educating and training individuals to be effective…

$510k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$14,703
Largest grant, FY2025
$477,399
States reached, FY2025
3

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Hawaii Foundation$477,39910%
New York Rotary Foundation of the Rotary Club of New York$14,70312%
HN and Frances C Berger Foundation$12,7121n/a
Saint Louis School$5,0841n/a

Compare Japan-America Institute of Management Science with peer funders

About Japan-America Institute of Management Science

How much does Japan-America Institute of Management Science give?
Japan-America Institute of Management Science reported 4 grants totaling $509,898 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Japan-America Institute of Management Science fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (95%), International (3%), Philanthropy (2%).
Who are Japan-America Institute of Management Science's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: University of Hawaii Foundation ($477k), New York Rotary Foundation of the Rotary Club of New York ($15k), HN and Frances C Berger Foundation ($13k).
Where is Japan-America Institute of Management Science based?
Japan-America Institute of Management Science is based in HI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Japan-America Institute of Management Science’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home