Skip to content

· Private foundation

Janet H & C Harry Knowles Foundation Inc A/K/A Knowles Teacher Initiative

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
220
Grants FY2025still arriving
35
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0171% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.8MScience & Tech$448kYouth Development$102kHousing & Shelter$32kSocial Science$19kArts & Culture$17kEmployment$10kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 220 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k212 grants · $1.1M
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $97k
$5,571
Median grant
35
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$13,636
Individual grant recipient$13,344
Individual grant recipient$12,478
Individual grant recipient$12,190
Individual grant recipient$11,985
Individual grant recipient$11,754
Individual grant recipient$11,058
Individual grant recipient$10,361
Individual grant recipient$9,918
Individual grant recipient$9,826
Individual grant recipient$9,481
Individual grant recipient$9,462
Individual grant recipient$9,351
Individual grant recipient$9,329
Individual grant recipient$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TYLER HILL: $5k → 11%2001 HIGH TECH HIGH: $9k → 11%TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 214: $22k → 14%WESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 6%2001 HIGH TECH HIGH: $9k → 11%WESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.8M · 577 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

577 repeat relationships: 179 still active in FY2025, 398 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

577
252

Total granted

$9.8M
$1.0M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2025 · $61k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2025 · $58k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2025 · $55k

Funded once

  • TH
    Township Highshcool District 214
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 870 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+200 more: $5,449,369 · Other+200 more
Other$5,449,369

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Janet H & C Harry Knowles Foundation Inc A/K/A Knowles Teacher Initiative?

Find your warmest path to Janet H & C Harry Knowles Foundation Inc A/K/A Knowles Teacher Initiative through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 870 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Janet H & C Harry Knowles Foundation Inc A/K/A Knowles Teacher Initiative’s filings →

More from the funding graph