Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

James Barry Robinson Institute

The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$5.6MYouth Development$5.1MEducation$2.1MHealth$282kReligion$28kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $2,051,246 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,101,439 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,193 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$1,976,246
Median grant
1
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Next Step To Success$1,976,246
James Barry Robinson Home for Boys Trust$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $5.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JAMES BARRY ROBINSON HOME FOR BOYS TRUST: $4.5M → 19%JAMES BARRY ROBINSON HOME FOR BOYS TRUST: $1.0M → 19%James Barry Robinson Home for Boys Trust: $75k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of James Barry Robinson Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

James Barry Robinson Institutelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 7 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$13M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

100%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JB
    James Barry Robinson Institute
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5.6M · revenue +9%
  • NS
    Next Step to Success
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +321% · 86% of their budget
  • JB
    JAMES BARRY-ROBINSON HOME FOR BOYS TRUST
    2× · 2018–2021 · $2.1M · revenue +115% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • BO
    BASILICA OF ST MARY
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -29%
  • SP
    SAINT PIUS X CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Military Family Building Coalition
2
Barry-Robinson Schools of Norfolk

Barry-Robinson Schools of Norfolk is a non-stock, nonprofit Virginia-based corporation chartered in 2001. The organization is supported, supervised, and controlled by James Barry-Robinson Home for Boys Trust and was organized to construct…

3
Network for Exceptional Military Families
4
Military Family Resource Fund Mid Atlantic Inc

The Military Family Resource Fund Mid Atlantic (MFRFMA) exists to support, encourage and honor the military, their families, communities and associated organizations.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
6
Child Care Aware of America

Child care aware of america (ccaoa) is the only national organization that supports every part of the child care system. together with an on-the-ground network of child care resource and referral (ccr&r) organizations working in states and…

Human Services
7
Norad and Usnorthcom Enlisted Council
Public Benefit
8
National Institute of Military Justice
Human Services
9
Robins Airman and Family Readiness Activities Council

Provide services, events and activities for military service members, retirees and their families. provide family services, family education and deployment support to military community

Public Benefit
10
Warrior Canine Connection Inc

Support recovering combat veterans & their families utilizing service dog training/placement.

Human Services
11
Military Cyber Professionals Assn Inc

Dedicated to developing American military cyber professionals and investing in our nations future through science, technology, engineering and mathematics education.

Education
12
Marine Corps Association

The mission of the marine corps association (mca) is to support the marine corps by disseminating knowledge of military art and science among marines, provide opportunities for professional development for marines, and to foster the spirit…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Military Family Association and the most unlike its peers is Mercy Medical Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Next Step to Success — $5,066,159 · EducationNext Step to SuccessJAMES BARRY-ROBINSON HOME FOR BOYS TRUST — $2,060,000 · EducationJAMES BARRY-ROBINSON HOME FOR BOYS TRUST+3 more — $48,047 · EducationJames Barry Robinson Institute — $5,575,000 · Human ServicesJames Barry Robinson InstituteMercy Medical Angels — $277,030 · HealthTHE COMFORT CREW FOR MILITARY KIDS — $20,000 · HealthBASILICA OF ST MARY — $17,500 · OtherSAINT PIUS X CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $10,320 · OtherUS ARMY — $7,500 · OtherHOLLA INC — $6,000 · OtherANGEL AIRLINES FOR VETERANS — $5,000 · OtherBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC — $20,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Public Benefit
Education$7,174,206Human Services$5,575,000Health$297,030Other$46,320Public Benefit$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJames Barry Robinson Institute — $5,575,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNext Step to Success — $5,066,159 over 3y, 86% of budgetJAMES BARRY-ROBINSON HOME FOR BOYS TRUST — $2,060,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetMercy Medical Angels — $277,030 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetASSOCIATION OF DEFENSE COMMUNITIES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMFORT CREW FOR MILITARY KIDS — $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James Barry Robinson Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James Barry Robinson Institute?

    Find your warmest path to James Barry Robinson Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph