· Private foundation
James & Cecile Steven Scholarship Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
95% of James & Cecile Steven Scholarship Trust’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Northwest Missouri Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $6k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $123k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NW MO | $123,168 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,219 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,219 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,219 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
39 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2018–2022 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2018–2022 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2018–2022 · $3k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $500
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $500
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization James & Cecile Steven Scholarship Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James & Cecile Steven Scholarship Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to James & Cecile Steven Scholarship Trust?
Find your warmest path to James & Cecile Steven Scholarship Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on James & Cecile Steven Scholarship’s filings →