Skip to content
Jack Taylor Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jack Taylor Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$533k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$2.0MHuman Services$506kArts & Culture$84kPublic Benefit$82kCrime & Legal$55kYouth Development$25kEducation$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$300,000
SHRINERS HOPSITAL FOR CHILDREN$100,000
MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$50,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$25,000
THE DALI MUSEUM$25,000
K-LOVE$25,000
BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE$5,000
VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $459k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50k → 14%VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: $2k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: $500 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $125k → 15%VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: $500 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $100k → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
NE
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 16 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

81%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2020–2025 · $640k · revenue +25%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $428k · revenue +14%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $350k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
  • TT
    TUNNEL TO TOWERS FND
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • MD
    MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
7
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

—
12
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Sinai Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $640,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Health+3 more: $52,500 · HealthMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $295,000 · Human ServicesMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE F…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $151,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PR…+2 more: $13,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION SMILE INC: $427,500 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE I…BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE: $130,000 · OtherBASCOM PALME…K-LOVE: $65,000 · OtherK-LOVETURNING POINT USA INC: $41,000 · OtherTURNING POIN…TUNNEL TO TOWERS FND: $25,000 · OtherTUNNEL TO TO…PROJECT VERITAS: $16,000 · OtherMIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $57,500 · Arts & CultureAmerica First Legal Foundation: $55,000 · Crime & LegalJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $41,000 · Public BenefitTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $2,000 · Animals
Health$1,417,500Human Services$459,000International$427,500Other$302,000Arts & Culture$57,500Crime & Legal$55,000Public Benefit$41,000Animals$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $640,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $427,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $295,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $151,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $57,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerica First Legal Foundation: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $41,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMENNINGER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack Taylor Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack Taylor Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Vermont River Conservancy Inc: 21% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack Taylor Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home