Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jack R Linsky Foundation attn Robert Lang Esq

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Jack R Linsky Foundation attn Robert Lang Esq’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Atlantic And Cape May Counties, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
1
’18
4
’19
4
’20
4
’21
4
’22
5
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$56kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$25kEducation$16kAnimals$10kEnvironment$2kInternational$2kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$430k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation of Atlantic & Cape May Counties$15,000
Jewish Family Service$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Canine Companions: $2k → 9%Canine Companions for Independence: $1k → 7%Wounded Warriors Projects: $2k → 14%Canine Companions: $1k → 9%Wounded Warriors Projects: $2k → 14%Wounded Warriors Projects: $2k → 14%Canine Companions: $500 → 9%Wounded Warriors Projects: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$104k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $20k · revenue +32%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +50%
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • SU
    STOCKTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CR
    Christopher reeve paralysis foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Wounded Veterans Relief Fund Inc

Wounded veterans relief fund (wvrf), founded in 2009, is a veteran-led 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organization. our mission is to provide urgent financial assistance and critical dental care to florida's eligible wounded and disabled veterans.…

Human Services
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
7
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
12
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish Family Service: $47,773 · OtherJewish Family ServiceMichael J Fox Parkinson Foundation: $15,500 · OtherMichael J Fox Parkinson FoundationSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY+11 more: $18,000 · Other+11 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $19,500 · HealthCHRISTOPHER RE…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,250 · EnvironmentUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 · International
Other$91,273Philanthropy$25,000Health$19,500Human Services$11,000Animals$2,500Environment$2,250International$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES: $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeystone Paralyzed Veterans of America Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Keystone Paralyzed Veterans of America Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack R Linsky Foundation attn Robert Lang Esq funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack R Linsky Foundation attn Robert Lang Esq. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack R Linsky Foundation attn Robert Lang Esq’s filings →

More from the funding graph