Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$474k
Granted FY2025still arriving
83
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.4MHuman Services$151kHealth$65kPhilanthropy$59kInternational$56kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$32kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k69 grants · $141k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $192k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$2,060
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA ATERET TORAH FAMILY FUND$80,000
YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH$60,316
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH$42,300
SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC$25,000
CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,900
EDMOND SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$15,101
Individual grant recipient$13,625
SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC$13,000
SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC$10,000
THE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$10,000
THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER$10,000
HATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC$10,000
CHEVRAT PINTO FOUNDATION$10,000
KOL YEHUDA INC$8,603
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ADOPT A FAMILY: $6k → 8%EZER ELIYAHU: $5k → 10%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $4k → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKAH: $520 → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKAH: $190 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $101 → 11%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $520 → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $210 → 20%BETH OLOTH: $101 → 20%BETH OLOTH: $101 → 20%BETH OLOTH: $101 → 20%BETH OLOTH: $101 → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $25k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $9k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $7k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $3k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $520 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $501 → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $360 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $200 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 106 repeat orgs$663k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

106 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
154

Total granted

$2.0M
$518k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+20%

Still filing today

35%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $320k · revenue +51%
  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $64k · revenue +57%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • VN
    VARIOUS NON-RELATED PARTY CONTRIBUTIONS PAID
    one grant, 2018 · $45k
  • GO
    GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue -6%
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SUPPORTERS OF TORAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
9
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
10
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
11
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
12
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 296 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/89
Grantees still filing
55/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INC: $208,450 · OtherTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INCCONGREGATION SHAARE ZION: $127,900 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE ZIONYESHIVA ATERET TORAH FAMILY FUND: $124,000 · OtherYESHIVA ATERET TORAH FAMILY FUNDATERET TORAH CENTER: $107,420 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTEREDMOND SAFRA SYNAGOGUE: $82,375 · OtherYAD YOSEF BRIDAL FUND: $80,922 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $79,400 · OtherTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $66,000 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $65,716 · Other+149 more: $942,507 · Other+149 moreShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $319,780 · ReligionShuvi Nafshi Founda…GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $32,000 · ReligionGATEWAYS ORGANIZATI…KEREN YOM TOV INC: $30,000 · ReligionKEREN YOM TOV INCCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $17,000 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $16,723 · Religion+9 more: $26,082 · Religion+9 moreYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $30,761 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $23,600 · EducationBNOT SHIRAH OF DEAL INC: $9,100 · EducationYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $6,800 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $6,161 · EducationYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,720 · EducationMATTAN BASSETER INC: $5,400 · Education+3 more: $6,420 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $63,702 · Human ServicesEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $7,281 · Human ServicesAdopt A Family: $6,300 · Human ServicesEZER ELIYAHU INC CO MARCOS ZALTA: $5,200 · Human ServicesNISSIM VENIFLAOT: $3,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,640 · Human ServicesTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $33,300 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $1,800 · Food & NutritionSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $10,000 · HealthHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $10,000 · HealthLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthHATZALAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $3,600 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,501 · HealthNTM INFO & RESEARCH INC: $1,800 · HealthSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $25,200 · Youth DevelopmentDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $1,002 · Youth DevelopmentEIE ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,884,690Religion$441,585Education$93,962Human Services$88,623Food & Nutrition$35,100Health$34,401Youth Development$27,202

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $319,780 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $63,702 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $33,300 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $32,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $30,761 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $27,800 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $25,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $23,600 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $17,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $16,723 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOhel Torah: $16,520 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKOL YEHUDA INC: $9,166 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetBNOT SHIRAH OF DEAL INC: $9,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $8,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $7,281 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $7,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $6,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAdopt A Family: $6,300 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $6,161 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,720 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $5,501 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $5,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVA BIRKAT ISRAEL INC: $5,200 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEZER ELIYAHU INC CO MARCOS ZALTA: $5,200 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $4,601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,501 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $3,301 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $3,001 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,767 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS MENACHEM YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $2,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP: $1,865 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $1,820 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNTM INFO & RESEARCH INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,640 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Mikdash Shaul I: $1,601 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $1,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $1,002 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MABAS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Torah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY111.3× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bnot Shirah of Deal Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 296 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack D Cohen’s filings →

More from the funding graph