· Private foundation
Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k69 grants · $141k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $192k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA ATERET TORAH FAMILY FUND | $80,000 |
| YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH | $60,316 |
| MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH | $42,300 |
| SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC | $25,000 |
| CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC | $17,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,900 |
| EDMOND SAFRA SYNAGOGUE | $15,101 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,625 |
| SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC | $13,000 |
| SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE | $10,000 |
| THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER | $10,000 |
| HATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC | $10,000 |
| CHEVRAT PINTO FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| KOL YEHUDA INC | $8,603 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.
106 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SNShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC8× · 2018–2025 · $320k · revenue +51%
- SCSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC7× · 2018–2025 · $64k · revenue +57%
- TSTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC5× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- VNVARIOUS NON-RELATED PARTY CONTRIBUTIONS PAIDone grant, 2018 · $45k
- GOGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INCone grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue -6%
- CSCONGREGATION SUPPORTERS OF TORAH INCone grant, 2023 · $32k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious School
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
Support of religious schools in Israel
publish religious books
To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.
How this is measured
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 296 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
- Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
- Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MABAS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
- Who funds Ohel Torah ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
- Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
- Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
- Bnot Shirah of Deal Inc: 6% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Jack D Cohen’s filings →