Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Norman & Margaret J Reeves Private Foundat

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$195kReligion$86kFood & Nutrition$73kHealth$36kYouth Development$30kHuman Services$24kRecreation & Sports$21kPublic Benefit$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$964k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF PIEDMONT$8,000
THE CHILDREN'S LEAGUE$5,000
TRI-TOWNS AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM$5,000
ALLEGANY COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEMS$5,000
BRUCE OUTREACH CENTER FOOD PANTRY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FAITH IN ACTION INC$5,000
PIEDMONT LIBRARY$5,000
TRI-TOWNS FOOD PANTRY$5,000
TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,500
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
MINERAL COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
KEYSER ASSEMBLY OF GOD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 16%BURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST FAMILY: $2k → 16%BURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST FAMILY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$376k · 23 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
54

Total granted

$376k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+115%

Still filing today

13%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF PIEDMONT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k
  • AC
    ALLEGANY COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEMS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $34k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S LEAGUE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $34k

Funded once

  • MC
    MINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • MC
    MINERAL CO FAMILY RESOURCE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PIEDMONT: $37,500 · OtherCITY OF PIEDMONTALLEGANY COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEMS: $34,000 · OtherALLEGANY COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEMSTHE CHILDREN'S LEAGUE: $34,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S LEAGUEPIEDMONT LIBRARY INC: $32,000 · OtherPIEDMONT LIBRARY INCTRI-TOWNS AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM: $30,000 · OtherTRI-TOWNS AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMFIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $28,000 · OtherFIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCHTRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $26,500 · OtherTRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherFAITH IN ACTION INC: $18,500 · Other+79 more: $228,063 · Other+79 moreMINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200: $7,500 · Human ServicesBURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesANDREW COALITION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $2,000 · HealthHIS TABLE: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$492,563Human Services$10,500Health$2,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAITH IN ACTION INC: $18,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetMINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW COALITION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIS TABLE: $500 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MINERAL COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETW 42200 ↗
  • Who funds BURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Norman & Margaret J Reeves Private Foundat funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Norman & Margaret J Reeves Private Foundat. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Norman & Margaret J Reeves Private Foundat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph