Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Michael Bodnar Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$439kInternational$108kReligion$55kYouth Development$49kHealth$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kFood & Nutrition$25kRecreation & Sports$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
$1,332
Median grant
15
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHALOM FOUNDATION$25,000
CORRECTIONVILLE EMERGENCY RESPONDERS$25,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$22,000
RESTAURANT GIVING CIRCLE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION$10,000
MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE$10,000
FAMILIES SET FREE$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA$7,000
VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL$5,000
BUCK CARDINAL CLUB$5,000
BIG TABLE$5,000
EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION$4,995
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS$4,000
THE PHOENIX CLUB OF NASHVILLE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Joshua Chamberlain Society - Nashville: $1k → 4%BILL WILSON CENTER: $400 → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $400 → 8%Bill Wilson Center: $205 → 8%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $1k → 14%Camp Kesem: $1k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $1k → 14%Camp Kesem: $1k → 14%Camp Kesem National: $1k → 14%Camp Kesem National: $1k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $1k → 14%Camp Kesem: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$584k · 38 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
72

Total granted

$584k
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+16%

Still filing today

71%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $116k · revenue +21%
  • MB
    MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +6%
  • BS
    BOWMAN SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • SB
    STUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
9
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is La Promesa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
78/80
Grantees still filing
52/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $115,500 · OtherHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATIONVALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $54,380 · OtherVALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCORRECTIONVILLE EMERGENCY RESPONDERS INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherCORRECTIONVILLE EMERGENCY RESPONDERS INCORPORATEDBENEDICTINE FATHERS OF THE PRIORY: $15,150 · OtherNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $13,000 · Other+85 more: $155,835 · Other+85 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION …MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE: $82,000 · EducationMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVE…BOWMAN SCHOOL: $45,835 · EducationBOWMAN SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $9,500 · Education+10 more: $32,014 · Education+10 moreTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $72,500 · Human ServicesTHE SHALOM…Camp Kesem National: $7,500 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem…+3 more: $2,255 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $39,000 · Youth DevelopmentPhoenix Benefit Inc: $3,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE KILGORIS PROJECT: $22,745 · InternationalFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $10,000 · International+3 more: $2,486 · InternationalCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $22,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionRestaurant Giving Circle Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Big Table: $9,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyLINK STRYJEWSKI FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$378,865Education$279,349Human Services$82,255Youth Development$42,500International$35,231Food & Nutrition$24,500Philanthropy$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $115,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE: $82,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $72,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetBOWMAN SCHOOL: $45,835 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $39,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KILGORIS PROJECT: $22,745 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $11,995 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRestaurant Giving Circle Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Big Table: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PLANETARY SOCIETY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $8,214 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $4,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORGAN PROJECT: $3,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGEORGIA TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Benefit Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE CHOICE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOAK HILL SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,670 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCheetah Conservation Fund: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER: $1,005 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Sports Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOWMAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds THE KILGORIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Restaurant Giving Circle Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES SET FREE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Big Table ↗
  • Who funds THE PLANETARY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORGAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OAK HILL HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Benefit Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bright Funds FoundationCA22.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Lisa and Alan Engel Foundation · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Michael Bodnar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Michael Bodnar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J Michael Bodnar Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J Michael Bodnar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J Michael Bodnar’s filings →

More from the funding graph