Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Hugh & Earle W Fellows Memorial Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$212k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$358kHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Florida International University CO Emily Dawson$10,000
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine CO Halle Micchell$10,000
University of Florida CO Ailee Kirkpatrick$10,000
Florida State University CO Madison Patrick$10,000
Georgetown University CO Andrew Jimenez$10,000
University of South Alabama CO Darcy Blum$10,000
University of South Alabama CO Jasmine Corpuz$10,000
Florida State University CO Benjamin Linkous$10,000
University of South Alabama CO Cory Bennett$10,000
Florida State University CO Matthew Blum$10,000
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine CO Dalaney Turner$10,000
University of South Alabama CO Milly McGee$10,000
Florida International University CO Jake Cabassa$10,000
University of Florida CO Eunice Caabay$10,000
University of South Alabama CO Shelby Jackson$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Georgetown University CO Andrew Jimenez: $10k → 14%University of Central Florida CO McKayla Massey: $10k → 13%Escambia County Medical Society: $10k → 16%Florida State University CO Candice Rhodes: $10k → 19%University of Florida CO Ailee Kirkpatrick: $10k → 19%Samford University CO Lacey Marshall: $10k → 16%University of South Alabama CO Shelby Jackson: $10k → 19%Mercer University CO John Lovendale: $4k → 23%Chamberlain University CO Mikaela Carbaugh: $2k → 14%Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine CO Samantha Jacobson: $10k → 24%Howard University CO Kenah Williams: $4k → 14%University of Central Florida CO McKayla Massey: $10k → 13%Florida State University CO Jessica Laenger: $10k → 19%University of Florida CO Eunice Caabay: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Shelby Jackson: $10k → 19%Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine CO Abigail Efird: $10k → 24%Florida State University CO Benjamin Linkous: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Cory Bennett: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Benjamin Linkous: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Cory Bennett: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Meaghan Kane: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Isabella Dinelli: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO James Courtney: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Darcy Blum: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Alexandria Tolber: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Milly McGee: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Madison Patrick: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Jasmine Corpuz: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Alexandria Tolbert: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Amy Manderson: $4k → 19%Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine CO Halle Micchell: $10k → 19%University of South Alabama CO Gracie Cole: $2k → 19%Florida State University CO Sean Gabany: $10k → 19%Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine CO Dalaney Turner: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Matthew Blum: $10k → 19%Florida State University CO Madison Patrick: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 6 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$120k
$96k

Still filing today

0%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    Florida State University CO Benjamin Linkous
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k
  • UO
    University of South Alabama CO Cory Bennett
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k
  • UO
    University of South Alabama CO Shelby Jackson
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • FS
    Florida State University CO Sean Gabany
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • FS
    Florida State University CO Candice Rhodes
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • FI
    Florida International University CO Jake Cabasse
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Florida State University CO Benjamin Linkous: $20,000 · OtherFlorida State University CO Benjamin LinkousUniversity of South Alabama CO Cory Bennett: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of South Alabama CO Cory BennettUniversity of South Alabama CO Shelby Jackson: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of South Alabama CO Shelby JacksonFlorida International University CO Emily Dawson: $20,000 · OtherFlorida International University CO Emily DawsonUniversity of Central Florida CO McKayla Massey: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of Central Florida CO McKayla MasseyFlorida State University CO Madison Patrick: $20,000 · OtherFlorida State University CO Madison Patrick+28 more: $238,000 · Other+28 moreESCAMBIA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$358,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESCAMBIA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESCAMBIA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Hugh & Earle W Fellows Memorial Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Hugh & Earle W Fellows Memorial Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J Hugh & Earle W Fellows Memorial Fund?

    Find your warmest path to J Hugh & Earle W Fellows Memorial Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Hugh & Earle W Fellows Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph