Skip to content

· Private foundation

J&G Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$264k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$875kPhilanthropy$152kHealth$2kHuman Services$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$360Community Improvement$36Other$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $250k+1 grant · $264k
$300
Median grant
2
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHONEN VNOSEN$263,929
TALMUD TORAH DNITRA$40,631
CONG YL SOUTH 8$13,814
CONG YETEV LEV DSATMAR INC$11,375
CONG SHAREI EZRA INC$6,880
CONG SHAAREI CHAIM HIGHLAND MILLS$4,637
CONG MCRT$3,165
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
CONG YOTZER OHR INC$896
ATERES AVREICHIM$500
Individual grant recipient$360
ZICHRON MALKA$360
YESHIVA GEDOLAH OHR YISROEL$360
CHEVRA TOMCHA SHABBOS$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $954) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $250 → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $216 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $100 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $72 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $86 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $50 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 24 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$1.6M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

17%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    RENEWAL OF LIFE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $466 · revenue +10%
  • KI
    KAPAYIM INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $420 · revenue +167%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $402 · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CM
    CONG MOCHNE RAV TOV
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • TY
    THE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +1%
  • ML
    MIFEL LAHADRICH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bonei Olam Division of Central Jersey Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Bonei Olam Division of Rockland County

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
4
Avodat Avraham Inc
Religion
5
Ksav Sofer Inc
Philanthropy
6
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
7
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
8
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
9
Kosherivf Inc

to assist and guide couples through the challenging times of infertility so that they follow what Judaism and Torah says. To help verify Jewish identity among Jews looking to get married.

Religion
10
Ziv Partners Inc

Raise funds in support of ziv medical center, which delivers trauma care, advanced mental health treatment, and inclusive healing to israels most diverse and at-risk communities.

Health
11
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
12
Hatzolah Tosh Inc

Providing financial assistance to emergency organizations as well as other charitable, educational, and religious organizations worldwide.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Yad Lelev Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vaad Ha'artzy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $743,151 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHONEN VNOSEN: $568,529 · OtherCHONEN VNOSENCONGREGATION YL SOUTH 8: $83,576 · OtherTALMUD TORAH DNITRA: $55,931 · Other+53 more: $173,083 · Other+53 moreTHE OJC FUND: $149,933 · EducationTHE OJC F…THE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $76 · Philanthropy+1 more: $36 · PhilanthropyRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $466 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $402 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $86 · Human ServicesKAPAYIM INC: $420 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $336 · HealthJACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $720 · ReligionHATZOLAH OF WILLIAMSBURG INC: $360 · Public Safety & DisasterEZER MIZION: $72 · International
Other$1,624,270Education$149,933Philanthropy$1,312Human Services$954Health$756Religion$720Public Safety & Disaster$360International$72

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $149,933 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $720 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $466 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $420 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $402 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH OF WILLIAMSBURG INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $336 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $76 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds RENEWAL OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds KAPAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds HATZOLAH OF WILLIAMSBURG INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY56.1× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Nimlach Foundation · Kanfei Yoneh Foundation · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Blum Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Bochner Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Meisels Chai Family Foundation · Bbc Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J&G Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J&G Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J&G Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph