Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ivywood Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Education$8kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$1kHuman Services$1kInternational$900Civil Rights$900Arts & Culture$790Community Improvement$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$195k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,488
UNIVERISTY OF NOTRE DAME$1,500
APAC ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA CONCIL OF GA$500
ASSOC OF CHINESE PROFESSIONALS ATL$500
FUJIAN ASSOCATION OF SOUTHEAST USA$500
WABENPR$300
GEORGIA CHINESE LANGUAGE EDUCATORS INC$300
CHAMBLEE CROSS COUNTRY BOOSTER CLUB$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Boyscouts of America: $50 → 14%Chinese School Association in the U: $2k → 14%Sino-Usa Next Generation Foundation: $1k → 9%Xiamen University America Alumni As: $1k → 13%Chinese American Lions Club of Atla: $400 → 14%UNIVERISTY OF NOTRE DAME: $2k → 13%Chinese Community Federation of Atl: $250 → 9%Fujian Association of Southest USA: $500 → 13%CHAMBLEE CROSS COUNTRY BOOSTER CLUB: $150 → 14%University of Notre Dame: $1k → 13%FUJIAN ASSOCATION OF SOUTHEAST USA: $500 → 13%APAC ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA CONCIL OF GA: $500 → 14%University of Notre Dame Graduate B: $1k → 13%WABENPR: $300 → 13%APAC Asia Pacific American Council: $400 → 14%ASSOC OF CHINESE PROFESSIONALS ATL: $500 → 13%APAC Asia Pacific American Council: $100 → 14%WABE - NPR: $240 → 13%AAVED Asian American Voices for Edu: $250 → 14%HZ Global Health Foundation: $400 → 13%OCA GEORGIA: $3k → 14%GEORGIA CHINESE LANGUAGE EDUCATORS INC: $300 → 13%OCA Georgia: $2k → 14%United Way of Greater Atlanta: $200 → 13%OCA Georgia: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8k · 4 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$8k
$7k

Still filing today

0%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k
  • FA
    FUJIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST USA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k
  • W
    WABENPR
    2× · 2024–2025 · $540

Funded once

  • CS
    Chinese School Association in the U
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • XU
    Xiamen University America Alumni As
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • UO
    University of Notre Dame Graduate B
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $6,088 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChinese School Association in the U — $2,000 · OtherChinese School Association in the UUNIVERISTY OF NOTRE DAME — $1,500 · OtherUNIVERISTY OF NOTRE DAMEXiamen University America Alumni As — $1,300 · OtherXiamen University America Alumni AsUniversity of Notre Dame Graduate B — $1,200 · OtherUniversity of Notre Dame Graduate BFUJIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST USA INC — $1,000 · OtherFUJIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST USA INC+10 more — $3,590 · Other+10 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $1,200 · EducationUniversity o…North America Volunteers Inc — $1,000 · EducationNorth Americ…CHINESE COMMUNITY FEDERATION IN ATLANTA INC — $250 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $200 · Philanthropy
Other$16,678Education$2,200Arts & Culture$250Philanthropy$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth America Volunteers Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHINESE COMMUNITY FEDERATION IN ATLANTA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds North America Volunteers Inc
  • Who funds CHINESE COMMUNITY FEDERATION IN ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ivywood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ivywood Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ivywood Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph