· Public charity
Ivy Tech Foundation Inc
To receive, hold, invest and administer property; and to solicit and receive contributions; to make expenditures to or for the benefit of ivy tech community college.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $25,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,665,276 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,640,276 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA PHILANTHROPY ALLIANCE INC | $5,000 |
| BLOOMINGTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $5,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL MARKETPLACE COALITION | $5,000 |
| VISIT INDY | $5,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.
Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.
To recruit new business and industry into the laporte county area and combat community deterioration by promoting stability, growth, and development of business and industry.
To promote industrial and business development, diversification of indiana's economy, and overall economic growth of indiana; to promote the retention, expansion, growth, and modernization of indiana's businesses; to promote the creation…
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Promote development in Perry County, Indiana
To promote and improve the quality of economic development throughout the state of indiana.
The northeast indiana foundation's mission is support the partnership through sustained leadership, collaboration, transformative initiatives and the alignment of resources toward shared regional goals.
We are a comprehensive entrepreneurial center whose mission is putting business growth, innovation and entrepreneurship to work for northeast indiana
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Fort Wayne Metro Chamber Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ymca Foundation of Greater Indianapolis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dimension Mill INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOMINGTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds Visit Indy Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER KOKOMO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER FORT WAYNE METRO CHAMBER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana Philanthropy Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE SQUARE AREA COALITION ↗
- Who funds YMCA Foundation of Greater Indianapolis ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ivy Tech Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.