Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iswara Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$67kInternational$23kHuman Services$19kPhilanthropy$2kCivil Rights$1kEducation$1kHealth$975Public Benefit$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$14,900
GRACE HOME GIRLS HOME$8,200
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY EASTERN TERRITORY$1,521
ILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC$1,251
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$1,008
NYPD HONOR LEGION SCHOLARSHIP$500
EPIPHANY$467
PROJECT HOSPITALITY$200
PAKISTANI CIVIC ASSOCIATION$200
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY$150
AMERICAN LEGION POST$135
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY (LLC)$100
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 82% of grant dollars ($100k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 18% that went abroad ($23k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $556) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIRLS WHO CODE: $156 → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $325 → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $75 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OH
CT
CA
UT
VA
TN
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 18% of all-years giving ($23k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Sri Lanka$23k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 9 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$86k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+50%

Still filing today

22%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k
  • GH
    GRACE HOME GIRLS HOME
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k
  • G
    GOFNDME
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k

Funded once

  • TO
    TRINCO ORPHANAGE
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
  • FN
    FOUNDATION NIFIAS OF ATE CRISTO
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • BP
    BT PS 59 BEEKMAN HILL
    one grant, 2022 · $503
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
5
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
6
Healthix Inc

The mission of healthix inc. is to create an achievable, sustainable and replicable model for integrating clinical information across multiple health care organizations which supports new york state and federal strategic health information…

Public Benefit
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
9
Oneblood Inc

To enhance the health and well-being of others through our work with blood and stem cell products and by facilitating scientific research

Health
10
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
11
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
12
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilankai Thamil Sangam Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $64,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINCO ORPHANAGE: $22,618 · OtherTRINCO ORPHANAGEGRACE HOME GIRLS HOME: $16,725 · OtherGRACE HOME GIRLS HOMEIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+23 more: $12,797 · Other+23 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $400 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $156 · Human ServicesPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $118 · PhilanthropyBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 · HealthMEALS ON WHEELS OF STATEN ISLAND INC: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$121,640Human Services$556Philanthropy$118Health$100Food & Nutrition$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC: $1,251 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $156 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STATEN ISLAND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC ↗
  • Who funds NYPD HONOR LEGION SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGELING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STATEN ISLAND INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iswara Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iswara Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iswara’s filings →

    More from the funding graph