Skip to content

· Private foundation

Isonoma Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Civil Rights$296kArts & Culture$140kEducation$105kHealth$50kFood & Nutrition$39kCommunity Improvement$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH PHILLY FOOD CO-OP$31,471
THE YOUNG ARTIST PROGRAM$29,737
AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION$25,000
URBED$25,000
URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$547k · 8 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$547k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-10%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $148k · revenue +112%
  • URBED
    7× · 2018–2024 · $128k · revenue +18% · 40% of their budget
  • RC
    ROSEMONT COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +183%

Funded once

  • PUENTES DE SALUDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +95%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • BA
    BREAD AND ROSES
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
4
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
8
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
9
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
10
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
11
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
12
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosemont College of the Holy Child Jesus; the most unlike its peers is Urbed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE YOUNG ARTIST PROGRAM: $134,737 · OtherTHE YOUNG ARTIST PROGRAMSOUTH PHILLY FOOD CO-OP: $31,471 · OtherSOUTH PHILLY FOOD CO-OPIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $12,000 · Other+1 more: $8,000 · OtherAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION: $148,000 · Civil RightsAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH O…URBED: $128,000 · EnvironmentURBEDROSEMONT COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS: $40,000 · EducationROSEMONT COLLEGE …The New School: $29,672 · EducationThe New SchoolDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $15,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE U…+1 more: $500 · EducationPUENTES DE SALUD: $50,000 · HealthMOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$243,208Civil Rights$148,000Environment$128,000Education$105,172Health$50,000Arts & Culture$20,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION: $148,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetURBED: $128,000 over 7y, 40% of budgetPUENTES DE SALUD: $50,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetROSEMONT COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe New School: $29,672 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds URBED ↗
  • Who funds PUENTES DE SALUD ↗
  • Who funds ROSEMONT COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The William Penn Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Isonoma Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isonoma Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Isonoma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph